Register free! 
Arbitration - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3855   
Title Forum  Year
Renuka A Kattar vs Gees Marine Products(P)Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 234058]
CLB Chennai 2004
G Govindaraj vs Venture Graphics(P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 234057]
CLB Chennai 2004
A Devarajan vs N S Nemura Consultancy India(P)Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 234056]
CLB Chennai 2004
Cameo Corporate Services Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 234041]
SAT 2004
First Global Stockbroking (P) Ltd. rep. by Vruddhi Confinvest India (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 234040]
SAT 2004
JM Mutual Fund and JM Capital Management (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 234039]
SAT 2004
Sumedha Fiscal Services Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 234038]
SAT 2004
O.N.G.C. Employees Mazdoor Sabha vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 286189]
HC (Gujarat) 2004
Gurcharan Singh vs Allied Motors Award of the arbitrator-No bar to criminal proceedings-Civil proceedings or arbitration proceedings for recovery of dues and criminal proceedings for dishonour of cheque under s. 138 of the Negotiable Inst [LexDoc Id : 295709]
SC 2004
Maharashtra Engineering Plastic and General Kamgar Union vs Little Kids and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 286362]
HC (Bombay) 2004
State of Maharashtra and Anr. vs Prabhakar S. Thakur [LexDoc Id : 286358]
HC (Bombay) 2004
Ram Dass vs Chandi and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 283039]
Punjab and Haryana HC 2004
National Hydroelectric Power Corpn. Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 238106]
AAR 2004
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd., In re Book profits - Advance Against Depreciation (AAD) - The assessee, a public sector corporation, generated and supplied electric power to various states and state electricity boards at tariff rates notifi... [LexDoc Id : 237849]
AAR 2004
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. Writ petition seeking overruling of five-Bench decision and seeking reference to seven-Judge Bench-No reference made by any Bench for hearing by a larger Bench and doubting the correctness of five-Bench decision, Matter directed to be placed before five-Judge Bench-A five-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court ruled by a majority of 4:1 that the Bombay Prevention of Ex-communication Act (Act No. 42 of 1949) was ultra v [LexDoc Id : 129663]
SC 2004
Virender Singh vs Haryana Tourism Corporation Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 293584]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2004
Allahabad Bank Employees Union vs Allahabad Bank and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 291132]
HC (Bombay) 2004
State of U.P. vs Labour Court, Varanasi and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 286240]
HC (Allahabad) 2004
Intec Shares and Stock Brokers Ltd. vs Chairman, SEBI [LexDoc Id : 284863]
SAT Mumbai 2004
Rohtas Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs Official Liquidator [LexDoc Id : 284701]
Patna HC 2004
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Section Officer Brotherhood [LexDoc Id : 233932]
SC 2004
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Jalal Uddin [LexDoc Id : 233931]
SC 2004
Venkatesh Gururao Kuratti vs Syndicate Bank [LexDoc Id : 233930]
Karnataka HC 2004
T. Prabhakar Rao vs Registrar of Co-op society [LexDoc Id : 233929]
Andhra Pradesh HC 2004
Z P Engg. Divn. vs Digambara Rao [LexDoc Id : 233928]
SC 2004
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last