Register free! 
Arbitration - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 4878   
Title Forum  Year
Indian Finance Guaranty Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 284603]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Dinesh Kumar Dhir vs State of Punjab and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 283123]
Punjab and Haryana HC 2005
U. Krishnan vs Syndicate Bank and Ors. Recovery of dues in case of continuing guarantee - Period of limitation - A bank’s application for recovery of dues was not barred by limitation because the period of limitation began only from the date of b... [LexDoc Id : 289993]
DRAT 2005
Royal Airways Ltd. vs Additional Director of Income Tax Exemption from DTAA-Lease of aircrafts-Payment of lease rentals for aircrafts, to a company that was a resident of Germany, was not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agre [LexDoc Id : 285590]
ITAT (Delhi) 2005
CTT vs Singhal Brothers [LexDoc Id : 356245]
HC (Allahabad) 2005
Gummadi Aruna and Anr. vs Gummadi Constructions Ltd. and Anr. Simplified Exit Scheme-Transmission of shares-An application made by the respondent-company under the 'Simplified Exit Scheme' did not absolve the it from registering transmission of shares in the [LexDoc Id : 309414]
CLB 2005
Khatrano Devi (D) by L.Rs. and Ors. vs Hazari Sao [LexDoc Id : 308320]
HC (Patna) 2005
Sameer P.K. vs State of Kerala and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 306073]
HC (Kerala) 2005
Melvin Powell Vanaspati and Engg. Industries Ltd. vs Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. Winding up-Withholding of payments-The winding up of the respondent-company was upheld and it was barred from alienating any of its assets. The respondent-company had withheld payments [LexDoc Id : 305882]
HC (Allahabad) 2005
Delhi Jal Board v. Raj Kumar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 305659]
HC (Delhi) 2005
Vijay Chandra Prasad Singh vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 298572]
HC (Patna) 2005
Indiacom Ltd. vs Tata Teleservices Ltd. and Ors. Passing off-Prior usage-Prior usage was an important factor which had to be considered in the matter of maintenance of a claim for passing off. The defendant had established [LexDoc Id : 295818]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Illapu Apparao vs Somireddy Chenchu-naidu. [LexDoc Id : 293056]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2005
German Remedies Ltd. vs DCIT Reopening of assessment-Full disclosure in return of income-A notice under s. 148(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 that had been issued after the expiry of four years from the end of relevant assessment year for [LexDoc Id : 290218]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Delhi Jal Board vs Vijay Kumar Goel and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 285711]
Delhi HC 2005
Noise Pollution (VII), In re [Forum, Prevention of Environmental and Sound Pollution] vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 285602]
SC 2005
Jeles Education Society and Anr. vs R.T. Bhitale and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 285228]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Narain Das R. Israni vs Delhi Development Authority [LexDoc Id : 285050]
Delhi HC 2005
Mylapore Club vs State of Tamil Nadu and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 284992]
SC 2005
Baldev Singh vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284986]
SC 2005
Triloki Nath and Ors. vs State of U.P. [LexDoc Id : 284114]
SC 2005
Sohan Singh , Mahendra Pratap Singh Gill vs State of Uttaranchal [LexDoc Id : 284113]
SC 2005
Romesh Lal Jain vs Naginder Singh Rana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284112]
SC 2005
Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors. vs Mohinder Pal Singh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284111]
SC 2005
Forum, Prevention of Environment and Sound Pollution vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 284110]
SC 2005
 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last