Roopa Engg. Corpn. vs Telecom and Ors.
Appointment of arbitrator-Jurisdiction of arbitrator-Once a party had made an appointment of an arbitrator, it was not within the province of proceedings under s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac [LexDoc Id : 301286]
HC (Kerala)
2005
N. S. Arumugam vs Trishul Traders
Dishonour of Cheque-Burden of proof-The burden of proof to rebut the presumption that the cheque was for consideration, was on the drawer who had admitted to the execution of the cheque. [LexDoc Id : 298703]
HC (Chennai)
2005
Sahni Sons Manufacturing Co. vs Central Government and Ors.
Registration of Trademark-Opposition to registration-The objections against the registration of the trademark could not be dismissed without issuing a notice or giving a personal hearing to the objector [LexDoc Id : 296013]
Woodbriar Estate Ltd. and Anr. vs V. N. A. S. Chandran and Ors.
Oppression and Mismanagement-Maintainability of petition-A petition against oppression and mismanagement could not be rejected as not maintainable on the ground that the petitioner’s shareholding had been re [LexDoc Id : 322492]
Virage Logic International vs Assistant Director of Income-tax
Exemption: Unit set up in Free Trade Zone-Transfer of software to HO abroad-AY 2001-02. The assessee company, incorporated in India, was a 100 per cent subsidiary of a USA company and was engaged in software developing busines [LexDoc Id : 294961]
ITAT (Delhi)
2005
Prathyusha Associates vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd.
Setting aside award-Viable with public policy-Merely because the arbitral award suffered with trivial illegality, it could not be set aside and was not contrary to public policy. The arbitrator ha [LexDoc Id : 294946]
The CLB’s order against oppression and mismanagement was set aside because the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), a vital document pr [LexDoc Id : 289013]
