| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 5976 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Rajendra Kumar Jain and Anr. vs Pankaj Gulati and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375157]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Suo Motu High Court on its Own Motion vs Government of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375142]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Krishan Kumar Jindal vs Rajendra Kumar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 374243]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Kamli Devi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 374224]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Darshan B.Ed. College vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 373342]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
E. Fathima Beevi vs Director, Enforcement Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 373245]
|
ATFE (Delhi) |
2008 |
Kolkata Port Trust and Ors. vs Basudeb Soren and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 372792]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2008 |
Karan Singh vs Authorised Disciplinary Authority, R.S.R.T.C. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 372327]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2008 |
Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. vs A.I. Chopra, Engineers and Contractors and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 371101]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Ramdhan @ Namdeo Savai Jadhav and Anr. vs. UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 368874]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Daund Taluka Arts and Commerce College and Ors. vs Macchindra Sahebrao Bhavar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 368715]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh vs OL
Winding up: Workmens dues-Award of interest to the workmen or employees-The high court, considering whether s.529, s.529A and s.530 of the Companies Act 1956 read with rule 6 and rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 [LexDoc Id : 367229]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Amitabha Dasgupta vs United Bank of India
[LexDoc Id : 364599]
|
NCDRC |
2008 |
Sesa Industries Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Scheme fair, just and reasonable, not violative of any law or contrary to public interest-The high court approved the scheme of amalgamation by stating that there was nothing unfair in the scheme and in a way it also gave an exit route to t [LexDoc Id : 363674]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Mahesh Chandaikar vs Dattaram Chandaikar and State of Goa
[LexDoc Id : 363670]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Parle Products (P) Ltd. vs Parle Agro (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 363093]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
UOI vs Gulam Dastgir and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 361419]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Venkata Sai Media (P) Ltd. vs Channel Plus-Ap (A Unit of Kal Communication (P) Ltd.)
[LexDoc Id : 360864]
|
TDSAT |
2008 |
Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs Ninan Thomas
[LexDoc Id : 357796]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Y. Yohannan vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 357773]
|
SC |
2008 |
Gopal Pal vs Goa Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd., Government of Goa and State of Goa
Goa Tourism Development Corporation Employees Union, Krishna D. Naik and Suhas B. Naik vs Goa Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. and State of Goa
[LexDoc Id : 354381]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Apa Bablo Gaunkar, Sonba @ Somnath Vishnu Gaunkar, Mahadev Vishnu Gaunkar, Krishna Guno Gaunkar and Laxman Raghoba Gaunkar vs State of Goa
[LexDoc Id : 354377]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Vinod Solanki vs UOI
Confession statement under coercion-Burden of proof-The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order of tribunal and ordered to refund the amount recovered from the appellant. The tribunals’ order did not [LexDoc Id : 353696]
|
SC |
2008 |
Thukral Mechanical Works vs P.M. Diesels (P) Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 353692]
|
SC |
2008 |
Samadhan Dhudaka Koli vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 353674]
|
SC |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
