| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 5538 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
PNB Investment Services Ltd vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 437492]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Surendra Nath Loomba and Ors.
Surendra Nath Loomba vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 434022]
|
SC |
2012 |
Sangeet and Anr. vs State of Haryana
[LexDoc Id : 434021]
|
SC |
2012 |
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Balakrishnan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 434020]
|
SC |
2012 |
Sampatraj R. Seth vs Enforcement Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 470260]
|
GOI |
2012 |
Pandurang Vinayak Deokar vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 458676]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Lalla Ram Kewat
[LexDoc Id : 440459]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2012 |
Lucknow Development Authority vs Ram Babu Mehrotra
[LexDoc Id : 439197]
|
NCDRC |
2012 |
Phoolan Wanti, Shyam Sundar Ahuja, Gurdeep Sachdeva and Ors. vs Janpriya Finance and Industrial Investment India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 439101]
|
NCDRC |
2012 |
Rajeev Arora vs Manoj Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 438783]
|
NCDRC |
2012 |
Grishma Securities (P) Ltd., Mihir Ghelani, Ketan Shah, Chandrika H. Gandhi and Chhabil C. Shah vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438268]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Deutsche Bank AG vs Pearl Engineering Polymers Ltd.
Maintainability of writ petition: Serious dispute raised with regard to sale and purchase agreement-Mortgage deed and hypothecation of movables and default clauses therein still there to recover amount due, Various questions requiring adjudication, Petitioner not remedyless to recover amount, Petition dismissed-The respondent had availed of financial assistance including term loan from a financial institution. As there were constant defaults and the liability [LexDoc Id : 437489]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Imaging Solutions (P) Ltd. vs Hughes Communications India Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 443520]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
Era Infra Engg. Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 447237]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
IDBI Bank Ltd. and Anr. vs DRAT, Chennai and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 446557]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Awasthi Construction Co. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 437675]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Nomura Services India (P) Ltd. @M/s. Lehman Brothers Services India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 437100]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Chaluvadi Murali Krishna and Anr. vs District Legal Services Authority and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 447240]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2012 |
Haryana Power Generation Corpn. Ltd. vs Vikas Cable Co. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 447233]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
Indusind Bank Ltd. vs Bhullar Transport Co. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 443521]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
K.M. Venkateswaran and Anr. vs AROC
Penalty for fraudulently inducing persons to invest money: Petition seeking quashing of proceedings-Mobilisation of amount not disputed, Burden on petitioners to prove amount not received from third parties, No document to that effect forthcoming, Case of the year 2003, No reason to quash proceedings, Petition dismissed-The respondent had filed a complaint under s.68 of the Companies Act 1956 alleging that the company had mobilised Rs.275 crores and Rs.29.40 crores th [LexDoc Id : 443382]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Rich Capital and Financial Services Ltd.@ Rich Universe Network Ltd., Rajeev Agarwal, Sanjay Gupta, Shashwat Agarwal and Dhrupesh Shah vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438747]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Gokul Chandra Das (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. vs Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 440685]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2012 |
Prashant J. Patel vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 438740]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Dipak J. Panchal vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 437598]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
