| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 5790 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Suresh Gadibabu Bhambal, Ramesh Gadibabu Bhambal, Suman, Sanjay Wamanrao Bhambal, Shashikant Wamanrao Bhambal and Chanibai wd/o Ganpatrao Sambre (Dead) through L.Rs, Durgabai and Ors. vs Nagabai, Baburao Janbaji Bambhal (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 460440]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Mumbai Cricket Association, Ravi Sawant, P.V. Shetty and Nitin Dalal vs Gopinath Munde, Sanjeev M. Gorwadkar, C.T. Shanghvi and Sharad Pawar
[LexDoc Id : 460297]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
State of Maharashtra vs Sayyad Abdulhak Sayyad Khaja, Ramesh Malikarjun Swami, Santosh Gundappa Kalshetti and Jahangir Babumiya Bhalke, Ismile Ibrahim Khan
[LexDoc Id : 460289]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Razique Ahmed, Asharafkha and Rajesh Singh Rambarojsingh Thakur
[LexDoc Id : 460279]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Karim Khan, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Tushar Janardhan Sawarkar and Mohammad Ashik Khan Mohammad Kadir
[LexDoc Id : 459920]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Municipal Council vs Bhanudas Jayawanta Sonawane
[LexDoc Id : 459892]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Anil Kondiba Satoshe vs Nanda Anil Satoshe
[LexDoc Id : 459881]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Baroda Crystal Glass Works Ltd. and Ors. vs Suman Kumar Sinha
Order to rectify register passed without supporting evidence-No proof of amount allegedly paid, No urgency to allow petition and direct rectification, Impugned order quashed-The respondent had contended that he had inherited certain shares and an amount of Rs.31.19 lakhs with interest payable up to the date of actual payme [LexDoc Id : 459871]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2013 |
Sandip Pandurang Nannaware vs Shrigonda Krishi Utpana Bazar Samiti and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 459815]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
LI and Fung India (P) Ltd. vs CIT
ALP - Outsourcing Services- Captive Outsourcing provider-Cost plus Mark up vis-s-vis FOB Value-A.Y. 2006-07.
The LFIL is 100% subsidiary of LFIL(M) a Co. of Mauritius. It was a captive off-share sourcing provider for LFT a group Co. of Hong [LexDoc Id : 457760]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2013 |
Exploitation of Children in Orphanages, In re vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 454372]
|
SC |
2013 |
Dalmia Cement Bharat Ltd. vs State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 454371]
|
SC |
2013 |
Mehool Bhuva vs Indo-Nippon Chemical Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 479636]
|
CLB |
2013 |
Shree Renuka Energy Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 473872]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2013 |
Bank of New York Mellon vs Zenith Infotech Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 460451]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Sushma Murlidhar Ghadge, Abhiman Pandurang Pandhre, Digambar Devrao Bhosle (Dead) through L.Rs, Muktabai Ramchandra Suryavanshi (Dead) through L.Rs, Nagnath Ramchandra Suryavanshi, Jaya Ankush Aldar and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 460442]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Chand and Ayesha vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 460295]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Pratap Shivaji Chumbale vs Deepak Vishanath Pingale, Pratik Balasaheb Rahade, Dwarkadas Pragaji Vrundavan, Nalin M. Kapadia, N.N. Kapadia, Narendra P. Mehta, Mulraj Nanavati and Balmukund Pandya
[LexDoc Id : 460263]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Dasharath Bhaguji Jadhav, Jaysingh Dasharath Jadhav, Devidas Dasharath Jadhav and Harishchandra Dasharath Jadhav vs Kisan Bhaguji Jadhav, Ankush Kisan Jadhav, Lahu Kisan Jadhav, Mane Developers, J.M. Developers and Builders and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 459900]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
Chandrakant Shriram Sharma vs State of Maharashtra and Vilas C. Jadhav
[LexDoc Id : 459897]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2013 |
ACIT vs Casio India Co. (P) Ltd.
Casio India Co. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 459852]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
Ramratan Prasad vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 459244]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2013 |
Sinosteel India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 458713]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2013 |
Ashok Kumar Sinha vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458627]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2013 |
Mitsubishi Corpn., In re
Maintainability of Application before AAR-Pendency of proceeding before A.O.-If the impugned claims are shown in the return and notice u/s 143(2) is issued, it can be said that the question raised was pending before the A.O..LexDoc Id : 457039]
|
AAR |
2013 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
