| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2225 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
V.B. Secrity Services vs Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 481869]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Shivam Enterprises Informant vs Kiratpur Sahib Truck Operators Co-op Transport Society Ltd. and Ors.
Limiting and controlling the provision of services in the market-Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. Entry of new entrants. Unfair competition-Whether, the OP had contravened the provisions of section 3 of the act, 2002. Held, from the business model followed by OP 1, it was evident that OP 1 [LexDoc Id : 479019]
|
MISC |
2015 |
Amit Mittal vs DLF Ltd. and Ors.
Unfair and discriminatory agreement -Section 4 of the of the Competition Act, 2002. Abuse of dominant position -Opposite Parties (OP) launched a residential township of apartment units. There was non-negotiable Apartment Buyer's Agreement was executed between th [LexDoc Id : 479005]
|
MISC |
2015 |
Sanjay Goel vs Chief Executive Officer and Ors.
Discriminatory and unfair terms and conditions on the allottees-Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Abuse of dominant position-Informant being aggrieved by the allotment of the land on leasehold basis by the Opposite Parties (OPs) even after payment of all charges made allegat [LexDoc Id : 478877]
|
MISC |
2015 |
Triniti Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 478756]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
Rak. Ceramics India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 478751]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
Triniti Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Transfer pricing adjustment-Rule 10B (1) (a) of Income Tax Rules, 1962. Determination of Arm Length Price -AO noticed that assessee had entered into international transaction with its Associated Enterprises (AE) and made reference to the Transfer Pricing Of [LexDoc Id : 478680]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
Rak. Ceramics India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Determination of arm's length price of royalty paid to associated enterprises (AE) -Rule 10B (1)(a) of Income Tax Rules, 1962. Arm Length rate of royalty -Assessee/Indian Company was wholly owned subsidiary of Company in United Arab Emirates. Assessee in its TP study bench marked transaction with AE by a [LexDoc Id : 478675]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
Triniti Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Adjustment on Armed Length Pricing (ALP): International Taxation-Additions on ALP -AO noticed that assessee entered into international transaction with its Associated Enterprises (AE) and referred to the TPO for determining Arm's Len [LexDoc Id : 477464]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
R.A.K. Ceramics India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Determination of Armed Length Pricing: Reduction of Royalty Payment-Additions on Transfer Pricing adjustment -TPO observed that as assessee had not been able to conclusively establish the benefit test for the receipt of technology, the arm's length percentage [LexDoc Id : 477459]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2015 |
Ashok Kumar vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 477338]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Kandivali Co-op Industrial Estate and Anr. and Bulwark Warehousing Co. and Ors. vs Municipal Corpn. of Greater Mumbai and Ors.
Wadi Bunder Cotton Press Co., Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing (P) Ltd. and Ors. and Narendra and Co. and Anr. vs Brihan Mumba
Levy of taxes or fees: Delegation of power by legislature-Act of delegating power to local body without providing a maximum rate not by itself rendering the delegation excessive or invalid-A fee undoubtedly, was a payment primarily in public interest, but for some special services, rendered or some special work done for the benefit of th [LexDoc Id : 477016]
|
SC |
2015 |
Jitendra Khimshankar Trivedi and Ors. vs Kasam Daud Kumbhar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 487936]
|
SC |
2015 |
Pradeep Kumar vs State of Himachal Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 487933]
|
SC |
2015 |
Punjab State Power Corpn. Ltd. vs Ceylon Biscuits (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Winding up: Overriding preferential payments-Application of s.529A-An order with respect to costs, charges and expenses to be incurred in the winding up of a company followed their own pattern of priority and did not [LexDoc Id : 483344]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
C. Valliappa vs H. Syed Abuthakir and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 483331]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2015 |
N. Chaurasia Associates vs Northern Coalfields Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 483287]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2015 |
Aithent Technologies (P) Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 483177]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Prince Kumar and Ors. vs Institute of Co. Secretaries of India and Ors.
Internal management of an association-Scope of interference by court-In matters of internal management of an association, the courts normally did not interfere, leaving it open to the association and its members to fram [LexDoc Id : 482286]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Virag Pramodrai Joshi vs GIDC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 481617]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Adarsh Vidhya Mandir vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 481608]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Jyoti Swaroop Arora vs Tulip Infratech Ltd. and Ors.
Cross examination of the informant-Regulation 41 of the General Regulations. Opportunity to cross examined-Opposite parites sought cross examination of informant before the Commission. Whether, the opportunity of cross examination can be given to opposite p [LexDoc Id : 479018]
|
MISC |
2015 |
Ravinder Kumar vs D.T.C. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 477540]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Manish Gupta, Ritika Malhotra, Swati and Navita vs Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital and NCT of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 477327]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Ramji Rai vs Subhadra Sharma and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 477326]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
| |
| First | Prev | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | Next | Last |
| |
