| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1858 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Pethakkottai Simmachalam and Ors. vs Kannan and Ors.
Payment of interest on compensation: Interest accruing a month after date of accident-Insurance company directed to pay interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum-
Whether the commissioner was justified in disallowing interest. Held, it was well settled that interest for compensation amount would accrue a m [LexDoc Id : 506132]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Executive Engineer vs Jagdish Chand
Award of labour court: Claim of abandonment of job by workman not established-Persons junior to workman retained and appointed, Award was just and reasoned-
Whether the award holding the workman entitled to seniority, continuity in service from the date of his termination except back wages and direct [LexDoc Id : 506130]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Sr. Executive Engineer and Ors. vs Mansa Ram and Ors.
Award of labour court: Junior workmen engaged after termination of workman-No opportunity for re-engagement given, Workman gainfully employed during relevant period, Award not interfered with-
Whether the award holding that termination of services of workman had been effected without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disp [LexDoc Id : 506122]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
M. Kanniyappan vs Labour Court and Ors.
Termination of services: Strict proof of evidence to prove charges not necessary-Power under section 11-A discretionary, Order of termination modified-
Whether termination of appellant's service by the second respondent was legal. Held, the appellant had denied the charges levelled against him t [LexDoc Id : 506119]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Sunil Kumar vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Termination of services: Petitioner appointed by Chief Medical Officer-Member Secretary having no jurisdiction to terminate, Extension of service by order of State Government-
Whether termination of services of the petitioner, who was employed as computer operator on contract basis, under Mukhyamantri BPL Raksha Kosh Sch [LexDoc Id : 506108]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
A.L. Haripara vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Prayer for deemed promotion: Denial of promotion due to previous punishment and lack of proved merit and efficiency-End of punishment with specific endorsement that it was without future or cumulative effect, Petition allowed-
Whether the prayer for deemed promotion and consequential benefits from deemed date could be allowed. Held, when the petitioner was within the zon [LexDoc Id : 506076]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Gunny Trades Association vs Indian Sugar Mills Association and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506006]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
LSR Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 505845]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
K.V.T. Builders (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 505844]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs Trichy Construction Co. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505838]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
DBM Geotechnics and Constructions (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505823]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
D. Pukeho Mao and Ors. vs State of Manipur and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 505821]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
STCI Finance Ltd. vs Sukhmani Technologies (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Facility agreement-Performance of contract-Whether, respondent nos 2 to 5 are bound by arbitration clause in "Facility Agreement" executed between STPL and STCI. Held, agreement to stand as sur [LexDoc Id : 505748]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs Deltron Electronics
Applicability of Act-Section 16 and Section 18 of Small Enterprises Act. Enforcement of liability.-Whether, claim of petitioner was within time or not. Held, It is not respondent's case that even if Limitation Act were to apply, claims were within t [LexDoc Id : 505740]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Yashraj Containeurs Ltd. and Ors. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 505617]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences vs Chiranjive Medico and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504036]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
Raj Petro Specialities (P) Ltd. vs Universal Logistics and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506425]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
R.C. Nair vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Entitlement to second higher grade scale: Effect of Government Resolutions-Higher grade pay scale awarded w.e.f. 2002 when 24 years in service completed-
Whether the petitioner could be granted the second higher grade scale w.e.f. 01 June 2002 in terms of Annexure D to Government Resolution dated [LexDoc Id : 506178]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Allahabad Bank vs Srikanta Pradhan and Ors.
Reinstatement order: Finding of tribunal without any conclusive proof regarding continuous service-Restoration application filed after publication of award in Official Gazette rightly rejected-
Whether the tribunal had correctly passed the order of reinstatement on the ground that since the workman was employee of the management for mor [LexDoc Id : 506238]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Satish Saw Mill vs Shambhu Mahto
[LexDoc Id : 506223]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Gangikuntal Sridhar and Ors. vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
Employer employee relationship: Outsourced employees-Replacing one set of outsourced employees with another set by prescribing higher qualifications deprecated-
Whether the third respondent (trust) was the de jure employer of the appellants. Held, the appellants had been recruited by the outsourcing agen [LexDoc Id : 506218]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2016 |
Rajendra Vashishtha Bhatt vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506180]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Muhammad Yousuf Bhat vs State of JandK and Ors.
Notice of compulsory retirement: No adverse remark recorded in ACRs and APRs of petitioner-Involvement in criminal cases not a ground for compulsory retirement, Notice quashed-
Whether the notice given to petitioner stating that he, having already rendered 22 years of service, should retire from service with effect from [LexDoc Id : 506173]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2016 |
M. Balakrishnan vs State of Kerala
Kerala Education Rules 1959: Entitlement to benefits provided under rule 67(8) of Chapter XIV-A-Culmination of disciplinary proceedings in punishment not fettering rights to claim benefits-
Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefits provided under rule 67(8) of Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules 1959 and whether the [LexDoc Id : 506118]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
UOI vs E. Bharath and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506115]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
