First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 1858 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vivek Singh and Ors. vs Mohan Singh Tomkiyal and Ors.
Entitlement of constables of PAC and IRB to be included in selection process: Merit as the criterion for selection-Promotional course undergone by a constable, Constables and head constables falling in different classes-
Whether constables belonging to the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) and the Indian Reserve Battalion (IRB) were entitled to be included in t [LexDoc Id : 506592]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
Management of Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
Special provision for adjudication: Refusal to pass order for reinstatement-Award becoming enforceable on publication in Official Gazette-
Whether the order passed on an application filed under section 33-A of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 whereby and whereunder the tribunal had [LexDoc Id : 506588]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Vinod Malik and Ors. vs Delhi Energy Development Agency and Ors.
Penalty of dismissal from service: Possible and plausible view taken by inquiry officer-Articles of charge proved, Refusal of court to exercise extraordinary powers under article 226-
Whether imposition of penalty of dismissal on the petitioners along with a disqualification for future employment under the government, was sustai [LexDoc Id : 506517]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Than Singh vs UOI and Ors.
Dismissal order: Refusal to participate in departmental proceedings-Category of petitioner mentioned as Scheduled Tribe in service book, Genuineness thereof not disputed, Failure to rebut presumption-
Whether the order of dismissal could be interfered with. Held, due to non-supply of documents the petitioner had refused to participate in depar [LexDoc Id : 506515]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Tejvinder Kaur Ahuja and Ors. vs M.D. Gupta and Ors.
Notional promotions: Binding effect of Recruitment Rules-Holding of competitive examination a mandatory requirement, Institute directed to carry out promotional exercise for relevant posts-
Whether the promotions, which had been given nearly 15 years' earlier, to the petitioners were illegal in the context of Recruitment Rules 1986. [LexDoc Id : 506514]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2016 |
St. Marys School and Ors. vs Rajendra Pratap Singh and Ors.
Deemed continuation in service: Probationary period of three years-Petitioner working for over four years, No grave and exceptional circumstances to terminate service-
Whether the first respondent was deemed to be confirmed in the services with the petitioners (school) on completion of three years' period of prob [LexDoc Id : 506510]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Forest Department and Ors. vs Labour Court No. 2 and Ors.
Order directing reinstatement in service without back wages: Termination held illegal-Retrenchment not in accordance with Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Nothing perverse or illegal attributable to impugned award-
Whether the order whereby the termination of workman had been held to be illegal and he had been held entitled to be reinstated in service but w [LexDoc Id : 506504]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Ved Prakash vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi School Education Act 1973: Benefit of re-employment-Re-employment up to 62 years of age not falling in the expression 'prescribed benefits' under section 10-
Whether the petitioner could get the benefit of re- employment up to the age of 62 years on the application of section 10 of the Delhi School Ed [LexDoc Id : 506480]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Tata Steel Ltd. vs Lindsay International (P) Ltd.
Loss of goodwill-Awarded sum-Tribunal awarded Rs. 1 Crore for loss of goodwill and/or loss of business. Whether, Tribunal awards a sum without any acceptable reason or justificati [LexDoc Id : 506432]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
National Highways Authority of India vs Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.
Interpretation of contract-Execution of work-Arbitral Tribunal passed award in context of certain disputes that had arisen between parties in relation to contract entered into between parties for [LexDoc Id : 506348]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
K.C. Rakesh vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Claim for interest on delayed payment of pensionary benefits-Claim denied earlier, Principles of res judicata and constructive res judicata applicable-
Whether the third respondent was liable to pay interest on delayed payment of pensionary or retirement benefits to the petitioner. Held, the pet [LexDoc Id : 506322]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
J. Mani Chetty vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Entitlement to pension: Petitioner putting in more than 10 years in service-Option under the Government Order not exercised, Respondents directed to consider petitioner's representation-
Whether the respondents could be directed to sanction and pay pension to the petitioner w.e.f. 01 January 1988. Held, the petitioner had been sele [LexDoc Id : 506321]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Debabrata Shee and Ors. Govt. of Assam and Ors.
Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1964: Penalty of dismissal-Disciplinary inquiry initiated and conducted in total derogation of procedure laid down in rule 9, Penalty set aside-
Whether the procedural safeguards enshrined under rule 9 of the Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1964 had been complied with while i [LexDoc Id : 506319]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2016 |
Chhaganbhai Devabhai Baraiya vs Collector and Ors.
Entitlement to family pension and retirement benefits: Deceased permanent employee from date of her original appointment-Option for pension scheme given by deceased before her death, Denial of benefits arbitrary and illegal-
Whether the respondents could be directed to pay the benefit of family pension and other retirement benefits to the petitioner with interest. Held [LexDoc Id : 506317]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Magnum Equity Broking Ltd. vs SEBI
[LexDoc Id : 506012]
|
SAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
T.P. Prakashan vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 507118]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Little Eye Software Labs (P) Ltd. vs Nil
[LexDoc Id : 507051]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Management of MRF Ltd. vs Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
Dismissal of petition seeking joint trial: Demands of parties related and witnesses to be examined similar-Interests of both parties safeguarded by virtue of joint trial, Tribunal directed to pass common order-
Whether the first respondent was justified in dismissing the petition seeking joint trial of industrial disputes. Held, it was not necessary tha [LexDoc Id : 506591]
|
HC (Madras) |
2016 |
Kalyan Nasta Gruh and Ors. vs Labour Court and Ors.
Grant of reinstatement and 50 percent back wages: Date of discontinuance more than two decades ago-Date of award after almost 12 years from date of discontinuance, Compensation awarded in lieu of reinstatement-
Whether it was equitable to grant a relief of reinstatement and 50 percent back wages by sustaining the impugned award. Held, the date of discon [LexDoc Id : 506586]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Ajit M. Pujeri and Ors. vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 506530]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Tanwir Alam and Ors. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Entitlement to receive marks: Teacher Training Course Certificate obtained before June 2005-Training course studied with institutes affiliated to NCTE, Petitioners entitled to receive appointment orders-
Whether the petitioners were entitled to receive 22 marks as per the West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules 2001 on the ground th [LexDoc Id : 506513]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Vinay Pratap Singh Chouhan and Ors. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Reservation in posts for areas included in Tribal Sub Plan: All petitioners residents of Scheduled Area-Petitioners entitled for their consideration at the place applied for by respondents' own showing-
Whether the respondents could be directed to consider the cases of petitioners and allow them to participate in the further selection process. H [LexDoc Id : 506481]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
Board of Trustees Port of Chennai vs Metso Minerals India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Performance certificate-Terms of contract-Majority of Arbitrators passed Award, directing claimant to pay to first respondent balance amount receivable by first respondent under contract, Bank [LexDoc Id : 506434]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Essar Procurement Services Ltd. vs Paramount Constructions
Setting aside of arbitral award-Loss of profit-Arbitral tribunal allowed few claims made by respondent and directing petitioner to pay certain amount to respondent. Whether, award passed by arbitra [LexDoc Id : 506344]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
N. Prakasan vs CTO and Ors.
Penalty order-Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Payment of presumptive tax.-Petitioner challenged penalty order passed under Section 22(7) of Act. Whether, penalty order passed under Section 22(7) of Act liable to be set aside [LexDoc Id : 507007]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|