First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2418 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Seapearl Enterprises vs DCIT
Interest chargeable: Delay in filing return-Law applicable: Amendment with retrospective effect-As per amended s.234A and s.234B made with effect from 1 April 1989, the interest was chargeable on tax on assessed income and not on returned income. [LexDoc Id : 328431]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2005 |
APS Associates (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Unexplained cash credits-Discharge of onus, Issuing of summons to creditors-The amount of cash credits, standing in the name of certain creditors whose addresses were given with a request to issue them summons, could not be ad [LexDoc Id : 315402]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2005 |
St. George Educational Trust vs DIT
Registration of a charitable trust-Scope of enquiry-AY 2002-03. The assessee, an educational trust, had applied for grant of registration. While granting registration what was required to be considered [LexDoc Id : 303604]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2005 |
Sea Pearl Enterprises vs DCIT
Interest chargeable: Late filing of return-Validity of retrospective amendment-The omission of Explanation 4 to s.234A and substitution of Explanation 1 to s.234B of the Income Tax Act 1961 by the Finance Act 2001 merely clarifie [LexDoc Id : 300772]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2005 |
M. Sathya Narayana Reddy and Anr. vs Indian Bank
[LexDoc Id : 295764]
|
DRAT (Chennai) |
2005 |
Virage Logic International vs Assistant Director of Income-tax
Exemption: Unit set up in Free Trade Zone-Transfer of software to HO abroad-AY 2001-02. The assessee company, incorporated in India, was a 100 per cent subsidiary of a USA company and was engaged in software developing busines [LexDoc Id : 294961]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2005 |
Tata Tea Ltd. vs Inspecting Assistant Commissioner
Determination of agricultural income-Powers of Agricultural Tax Officer-AY 1994-95, 1995-96. The assessee was in the business of growing and manufacturing tea. The State government’s officer functioning under the Kerala Ag [LexDoc Id : 294682]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2005 |
CIT vs B.L. Garg
Perks: Gratuitous payment by the employer-Scholarship granted to employee’s son-AY 1990-91. The payment in the form of a scholarship granted to the assessee’s son at the sole discretion of the employer was exempt under s.10(16) of [LexDoc Id : 294003]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2005 |
CIT vs Sagar Mal Shamboo Nath
Change in Constitution of firm-Change in business of firm-AY 1983-84. The assessee firm, with its three partners, was in the business of commission and transportation. It later dissolved and a new firm was co [LexDoc Id : 293518]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2005 |
A.P.S. Associates (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Unexplained cash credits-Burden of proof on assessee-An addition of a cash credit to the assessee’ income was justified, as the onus to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the creditor and the gen [LexDoc Id : 293030]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2005 |
Nulon Electronics Ltd. vs ITO
Penalty: Delay in filing audit report-Unsigned audit report, Unintentional mistake-AY 2001-02. The unsigned tax audit report furnished by the assessee along with the return could be accepted as an unintentional mistake provided a dul [LexDoc Id : 292571]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2005 |
Packers (India) vs ITO
Rectification of mistake-Rectification of intimation issued under s.143(1)-The AO could not rectify the intimation issued under s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 in respect of the matters over which he was not empowered und [LexDoc Id : 292401]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2005 |
ACIT vs Selvi J. Jayalalithaa
Net wealth: Debts owed-Income tax and wealth tax liability-The income tax and wealth tax liability incurred by the assessee in connection with the taxable assets could not be allowed as ‘debts owed’ after the [LexDoc Id : 292400]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2005 |
A.P. Shanmugaraj vs DCIT
Validity of assessment: Irregular assessment-Assessment after the death of the assessee-The block assessment made after the death of the assessee without bringing on record his legal representatives was irregular. The notice for assessmen [LexDoc Id : 290838]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2005 |
R. Suresh Kumar vs ACIT
Exemption: Capital gains-Assessee owning more than one house-The assessee had become the owner of 1/4th share on partition of the HUF property subsequent to the order of the court. He was entitled to exemption u [LexDoc Id : 288566]
|
ITAT Chennai |
2005 |
Sonepat Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd. vs Rakesh Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 287428]
|
SC |
2005 |
ITO vs J.M.P. Enterprises
Salary to partners-Specification in partnership deed-AY 2002-03. Lower remuneration paid to four out of the five partners in the assessee-firm was allowable as deduction under s.40(b) of the Income Tax A [LexDoc Id : 287258]
|
ITAT Amritsar |
2005 |
Kankavali Shikshan Sanstha Ors. vs M.R. Gavali Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 285857]
|
SC |
2005 |
State of U.P. vs Neeraj Awasthi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 285672]
|
SC |
2005 |
CIT and Anr. vs O.N.G.C.
Income of non-resident: Fee for technical service-Non-resident providing technical services, Supervising staff for operation of drilling rigs-AY 1985-86. The non-resident provided to the ONGC its supervisory staff for operation and management of drilling rigs. The staff of the non-resident w [LexDoc Id : 338873]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2005 |
ACIT vs H.P. State Co-op. Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd.
Deduction: Income of a co-operative society-Income from banking activities-AY 2001-02. The assessee, a co-operative bank, lent money to its members. The interest income received by it on vehicle loans provided to its staff, s [LexDoc Id : 296632]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2005 |
CIT and Anr. vs Oil and Natural Gas Corpn.
Exemption from surtax-Non-resident company-AY 1987-88. The assessee, a non-resident company, which entered into a service contract with the Indian company, was not entitled to exemption from su [LexDoc Id : 294029]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2005 |
Mukesh R. Marolia vs Addl. CIT
Exemption from capital gains tax-Purchase of new residential house-The gains accruing to the assessee on sale of certain shares held as long-term capital assets were exempt from capital gains tax since the sale procee [LexDoc Id : 292208]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2005 |
Kanodia and Sons vs CIT
New industrial undertaking-Year of actual production-AY 1976-77. The assessee had set up a flourmill in the AY 1971-72 but started formal production in the AY 1972-73. It was entitled to special deductio [LexDoc Id : 290533]
|
Allahabad HC |
2005 |
DCW Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 287297]
|
Gujarat HC |
2005 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|