First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2648 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs Lakhani Rubber Udyog Ltd.
Deduction: Investment Deposit Account-Computation of profits-AY 1988-89. The deduction under s.32AB(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 was to be computed after taking into account the business profits as computed und [LexDoc Id : 318295]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT vs Gorawara Plastics and General Industries (P) Ltd.
Interest on borrowed capital-Utilisation of loan for purpose other than sanctioned-The assessee company had invested the loan taken in acquisition of shares instead of utilising the amount for its project. In fact, the assessee was a [LexDoc Id : 316678]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Gujarat Distributors
Reference to High Court-Tribunal decision on facts-The tribunal had given a finding of fact on appreciation of facts on record that certain transactions were not that of the assessee. The findings were [LexDoc Id : 326376]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2006 |
UOP LLC vs Addl. DIT
Powers of Tribunal-Admission of: additional evidence-AY 2001-02. The Tribunal could admit additional evidence which was relevant for a just decision and come into possession of the department after filin [LexDoc Id : 325167]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
Jose Kuruvinakkunnel vs ITO
Validity of sanction for reassessment-Non-application of mind-The sanction for reassessment given by the CIT without application of mind was invalid.
S.151 of the Income Tax Act 1961
[LexDoc Id : 323363]
|
ITAT (Cochin) |
2006 |
Alice George and Rural Unit for Health and Social Affairs vs Lakshmi
[LexDoc Id : 321694]
|
HC (Madras) |
2006 |
CIT vs Global Corpn. Ltd.
Deduction: Income from exports-Loss on export of goods-AY 1996-97. No deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax Act 1961 was permissible since even after sale of import licence and receipt of duty drawback [LexDoc Id : 321238]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
UPO LLC vs Additional Director of Income Tax
Powers of Tribunal-Procedure for admission of additional evidence-
AY 2001-02. The tribunal was empowered to admit the additional evidence not only if it required such evidence to ‘enable it to pronounce judgment’ b [LexDoc Id : 318027]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
Vijesh Gupta vs GTO
Deemed gift: Adequacy of consideration-FMV determined by DVO-AY 1997-98. The difference between the fair market value of the assessee’s property as determined by the DVO and the sale consideration received by th [LexDoc Id : 317359]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
M.M. Financiers (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Undisclosed income: Unsigned agreement-Document found in search not acted upon-Block Period 24 November 1994 – 20 March 1998. A search under s.132 of the Income Tax Act 1961 was conducted at the premises of the assessee company’s [LexDoc Id : 317358]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2006 |
Jubiliant Enpro Ltd. vs DCIT
Speculation loss-Fall in market price of shares held as stock in trade-The loss suffered by the assessee due to fall in market price of shares held as stock in trade was speculation loss.
S.73 of the Income Tax [LexDoc Id : 316764]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Silicon Graphics Systems (I) (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Deduction on actual payment-Payment of customs duty-
The entire amount of customs duty paid by the assessee in the relevant year was deductible, even if the amount was included in the valuation of clos [LexDoc Id : 316697]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2006 |
UOI vs Gupta Builders (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Prosecution: Failure to pay TDS-Limitation for launching prosecution-The assessee had not paid the tax deducted at source. No notice to the assessee was necessary for launching prosecution. The prosecution was launched [LexDoc Id : 316494]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Idbi Bank Ltd. and Ors. vs Hubli Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 316371]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2006 |
Sunash Investment Co. vs ACIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Expenses on exempt income, Bona fide belief-No penalty for concealment of income could be levied on the assessee, who, under a bona fide belief that interest expenditure incurred on borrowed fun [LexDoc Id : 315715]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
CIT vs Rameshwar Dass Suresh Pal Cheeka
Appeal to the high court: Question of fact-Genuineness of cash credits-The question whether the assessee firm’s explanation as to the nature and source of the amounts credited in its books of accounts was satisfactory or [LexDoc Id : 306645]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
UOI and Ors. vs Sheela Rani
[LexDoc Id : 305490]
|
SC |
2006 |
CWT vs Prem Lata Kanodia
Valuation of assets of firm-Reference to appropriate valuation officer-AY 1987-88. The assessee was partner in a firm. The AO made reference for valuation of form's assets to the wrong DVO. The Tribunal rightly directed t [LexDoc Id : 343133]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs Jaiswal Trading Co.
Deduction on actual payment-Sales tax paid as per sales-tax rules within due date-AY 1986-87. The sales tax collected in March 1986, was paid within due time as per sales tax rules. The amount paid could not be disallowed.
[LexDoc Id : 343131]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CWT v Mehnga Singh
Limitation for: Wealth Tax assessment-Assessment on invalid revised return-AY 1967-68 to AY 1973-74. The assessee had filed revised returns for all the years on 28 March 1979. The revised returns were invalid. Therefore, asse [LexDoc Id : 338867]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CWT vs Meghna Singh
Limitation for assessment of Wealth Tax-Effect of invalid revised return-AY 1967-68 to 1973-74. The original returns were filed on 28 February 1974. These were revised on 20 March 1979. The original returns were belated. Th [LexDoc Id : 325316]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
S.A. Builders (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Non-deduction of TDS on credits-Interest chargeable-AY 1984-85 to 1986-87. The assessee had not deducted TDS on interest payable and credited to the accounts of the payers. The interest was chargeable e [LexDoc Id : 325315]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
CIT vs Poddar Swadesh Udyog (P) Ltd.
Powers of CIT(A), Duty of CIT(A)-Admission of additional evidence-AY 1992-93. The AO had made an addition of Rs.5272 lakhs as purchases from nine parties, which were not proved. The CIT(A) deleted the addition by per [LexDoc Id : 325299]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
CIT vs Rekha Lands (P) Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Bona fide belief of assessee-AY 1980-81. The assessee was in the business of sale of properties. Since the advance received by it on sale had been assessed as its business income, [LexDoc Id : 321243]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
General Glass Co. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Accrual of capital gains-Deemed transfer, Transferee unwilling to make payments-AY 1995-96. The assessee company, vide an agreement dated November 1994, decided to sell a plot of land for which it received earnest money and the ba [LexDoc Id : 320943]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|