First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2648 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Shaikh Sikandar Sk. Haidar and Ors. vs Saraswati Education Society
[LexDoc Id : 326202]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
CIT vs A. V. M. Production
Deduction: Export of goods/merchandise-Export of print of films-AY 1993-94. The assessee exported the print of films with right to exhibit the films abroad. It was sale of goods or merchandise. It was entitled t [LexDoc Id : 326009]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
R.B.K. Rajeswari Nachiar vs N.N.S.A. Mohamed Kasim
[LexDoc Id : 325044]
|
HC (Madras) |
2006 |
Amitabh Bachchan vs DCIT and Ors.
Professional income from foreign source-Income from anchoring TV programme-The assessee, a film star, anchored a TV programme wherein his skill as an actor was required. Since he was working as an artist, the amount received [LexDoc Id : 306643]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Delhi Development Authority vs UOI
Maintainability of writ petition by PSU-Obtaining clearance by COD-The petitioner was a statutory body controlled by Ministry of Urban Development. The writ petition filed by it against the AO’s order directing it to [LexDoc Id : 305446]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
Transcore vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 304958]
|
SC |
2006 |
Accountant General of Orissa and Anr. vs R. Ramamurty and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 304955]
|
SC |
2006 |
ACIT vs Motorola India Electronics (P) Ltd. and Motorola India Electronics (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 331073]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2006 |
ACIT vs Balbir Chand Maini
Capital gains-Non-genuine transactions-The evidence collected by the AO showed that alleged sale of shares was not genuine. Inspite of alleged sale the said shares continued in assesses's n [LexDoc Id : 327806]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2006 |
DCIT vs Ruchira Papers Ltd.
Validity of re-assessment-Change of opinion versus assessment under s.143(1)-AY 1993-94. The excess claim of deduction under s.80HH was claimed by the assessee in the original return. The return was processed under s.1432(1). S [LexDoc Id : 327325]
|
ITAT (Chandigarh) |
2006 |
CIT vs Mahesh Kumar A. Rathod
Prima facie adjustments to income returned-Debatable issue-The deduction claimed by the assessee could not be added back while processing return under s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 where the issue of ded [LexDoc Id : 320206]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2006 |
State of U.P. and Ors. vs Ruk Mangal Singh Rathaur
[LexDoc Id : 304956]
|
SC |
2006 |
Bar Council of India vs Board of Mang. Dayanand Coll. of Law and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 304950]
|
SC |
2006 |
Indian Overseas Bank vs U.T.I. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 326422]
|
DRAT (Chennai) |
2006 |
CWT vs Rakesh Kumar Jairath
Limitation for revision by CIT-Mistake or error made in original assessment order-AY 1976-77. The limitation under s.25(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 to revise the assessment should be reckoned from the date of original order in cas [LexDoc Id : 321244]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
IL and FS Investment Managers Ltd. vs ITO and Ors.
Validity of reopening of assessment-Reopening based on audit objection, AO’s opinion-AY 2003-04. The AO had allowed the assessee’s claim for depreciation in original assessment and reopened the same on the basis of audit objection, eve [LexDoc Id : 319604]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
Williamson Financial Services Ltd. vs CIT and Anr.
Deduction: Investment Deposit Account-Income of eligible business-AY 1990-91. The assessee’s income from dividend and investment were includible as its income of eligible business for computing deduction under s.32AB [LexDoc Id : 319582]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
Jai Nadershah Karani and Anr. vs C.M. Betgeri, CIT and Ors.
Validity of pre-emptive purchase of immovable property-Passing of a speaking order, Opportunity to parties-The AA, while passing an order of pre-emptive purchase under s.269UD of the Income Tax Act 1961, could not rely on comparable sale instances and concl [LexDoc Id : 318299]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2006 |
CIT vs Bihariji Construction (India) Ltd.
Interest on borrowed capital-No disallowance on surmises, Tax planning vs Tax evasion-AY 1991-92 – 1995-96. The assessee, an investment company, had suffered loss in share transactions. Since the transactions resulting in loss were duly [LexDoc Id : 317221]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
CIT vs Kuldeep Singh
Penalty: Late filing of return and concealment of income-Reasonable cause-AY 1972-73. No penalty for concealment of income could be levied on the assessee since out of the amount of contraband goods seized from his possessio [LexDoc Id : 316677]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
CIT vs S. Jayaprakash
[LexDoc Id : 305483]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
CIT vs Swaraj Mazda Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 305482]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
Malankara Syrian Catholic College vs T. Jose and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 304806]
|
SC |
2006 |
Praj Industries Ltd. vs JCIT
Penalty: Concealment of income-Presumption of concealment, False claim of depreciation-AY1994-95. The income returned was less than 80percent of the assessed income. The claim for depreciation was found to be false. There was a presumpt [LexDoc Id : 342762]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2006 |
National Co-op. Development Council vs CIT
Business expenditure-Amounts disbursed to co-operative societies-AY 1976-77 and AY 1981-82. The assessee corporation was founded under a statute for promotional business on co-operative principles. It received grant [LexDoc Id : 340282]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|