First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 2802 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Girilal and Company vs S.L. Meena, Y.P. Verma, K.A. Gopinathan and UOI
Validity of : re-assessment-Reasons to believe: Material facts not disclosed-AY 2001-02. The assessee was allowed deduction under s.80-IB(10). However, it had not discounted the exact size of the plot when it began new construc [LexDoc Id : 331266]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2007 |
CIT vs Willamson Financial Services and Ors.
Deduction: Manufacture and export of tea-Computation of deduction-The assessee was growing manufacturing and exporting tea. The deduction under s.80HHC was to be allowed after apportionment of income under rule 8(1) [LexDoc Id : 330378]
|
SC |
2007 |
Kundan Rice and General Mills and Anr. vs Bank of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 338312]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
ITO vs Shringar Cinemas (P) Ltd.
TDS: Payment of rent-Sharing of proceeds from exhibition of films-The assessee owned a cinema theatre. The provision of s.194-I of the Income Tax Act 1961 were not applicable where the assessee shared the proceeds of [LexDoc Id : 336718]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd.
Computation of: Book-profits-Dividend distribution tax-The Dividend distribution tax paid under s.115-O was deductible.
S.115JB(2) and s.115-O of the Income Tax Act 1961
[LexDoc Id : 335035]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2007 |
ITO vs Godrej Soaps Ltd.
Computation of book profits-Depreciation on Revaluation of assets: law applicable-The revaluation reserve was created by the assessee in the AY 1992-93 and no amount was debited to Profit and Loss account. The amount withdrawn from [LexDoc Id : 333960]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Jitendra Kumar and Ors. vs State of Haryana and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 330213]
|
SC |
2007 |
CIT vs Income Tax Settlement Commission and J. Jayalalitha
Admissibility of: Application for settlement-Condition precedent: Disclosure of income not discovered by AO, Unexplained cash credits added to income-AY 1998-99. In assessment the AO had made addition of Rs.1.72 crores under s.68 as unexplained cash credits. The application for settlement disclosing [LexDoc Id : 359846]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
Covanta Samalpatti Operating (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 342742]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Madan Roller Flour Mills vs CIT
Penalty: Delay in filing audit report-Application made for extension of time-The assessee made a request to the AO for extending time for filing return for the reason that the audit report was not ready. No reply to the request [LexDoc Id : 341488]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2007 |
CIT vs Eicher Goodearth Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Disallowance of claim of deduction or depreciation-AY 1996-97. The assessee had filed full particulars regarding its claim of depreciation and deduction under s.80M. The particulars furnished were not [LexDoc Id : 341261]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
ITO vs Amrit Kumar Patel
Maintainability of Appeal-Low tax effect-AY 1998-99. The tax effect being law, the appeal by the department was not maintainable since CBDT’s instructions under s.119 were binding on the depa [LexDoc Id : 338099]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Asia Power Projects (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 336058]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2007 |
Anwar Pasha vs CIT
Appeal to High court-Considering Supreme Court's judgement-The High Court was directed for giving a fresh decision as per law in the light of the judgment in: [289 ITR 341 (SC)].
S.260A of the Incom [LexDoc Id : 335309]
|
SC |
2007 |
CIT vs Air Liquide India Holding (P) Ltd.
Appeal to High court-Substantial question of law: Delayed deposit of TDS-The assessee had deducted TDS on salary paid but deposited it only after a survey under s.133A was conducted. The question whether penalty-interest wa [LexDoc Id : 335308]
|
SC |
2007 |
CIT vs Birla International (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 331130]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2007 |
CIT vs Income Tax Settlement Commission and J. Jayalalitha
Maintenance of: Application of settlement-No additional income declared before settlement commission-AY 1998-99. The assessee did not disclose any additional income i.e. income which was not disclosed before the AO or the income which was not discover [LexDoc Id : 330853]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Asian Hotels Ltd.
Benefit from business-Notional interest-The notional interest on refundable deposit received from the tenant could not be assessed as business income under s.28(iv) of the Income Tax Act 196 [LexDoc Id : 330637]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 350063]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
Archaeological Deptt. of India and Anr. vs Dinesh Chand
[LexDoc Id : 350021]
|
SC |
2007 |
Vemanna Reddy (HUF) vs ITO
Accrual of: capital gains-Date of transfer: Development agreement-AY 1998-99. The assessee had entered in to a joint development agreement of property with a builder. The vacant plot was handed over to the builder on [LexDoc Id : 335991]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2007 |
Finance Officer, Maharishi Dayanand University vs ITO
TDS: Value of perks-Accomodation at concessional rent-The assessee was charging standard rent from its employees who were allotted accomodation. The rent was charged at five percent of the basic pay. In e [LexDoc Id : 335085]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Escorts Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 333568]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Hughes Escorts Communication Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 333399]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
DCM Technologies Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 333156]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|