Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 2802   
Title Forum  Year
Girilal and Company vs S.L. Meena, Y.P. Verma, K.A. Gopinathan and UOI Validity of : re-assessment-Reasons to believe: Material facts not disclosed-AY 2001-02. The assessee was allowed deduction under s.80-IB(10). However, it had not discounted the exact size of the plot when it began new construc [LexDoc Id : 331266]
HC (Bombay) 2007
CIT vs Willamson Financial Services and Ors. Deduction: Manufacture and export of tea-Computation of deduction-The assessee was growing manufacturing and exporting tea. The deduction under s.80HHC was to be allowed after apportionment of income under rule 8(1) [LexDoc Id : 330378]
SC 2007
Kundan Rice and General Mills and Anr. vs Bank of India and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 338312]
DRAT (Delhi) 2007
ITO vs Shringar Cinemas (P) Ltd. TDS: Payment of rent-Sharing of proceeds from exhibition of films-The assessee owned a cinema theatre. The provision of s.194-I of the Income Tax Act 1961 were not applicable where the assessee shared the proceeds of [LexDoc Id : 336718]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2007
CIT vs Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. Computation of: Book-profits-Dividend distribution tax-The Dividend distribution tax paid under s.115-O was deductible.

S.115JB(2) and s.115-O of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 335035]
HC (Calcutta) 2007
ITO vs Godrej Soaps Ltd. Computation of book profits-Depreciation on Revaluation of assets: law applicable-The revaluation reserve was created by the assessee in the AY 1992-93 and no amount was debited to Profit and Loss account. The amount withdrawn from [LexDoc Id : 333960]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2007
Jitendra Kumar and Ors. vs State of Haryana and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 330213]
SC 2007
CIT vs Income Tax Settlement Commission and J. Jayalalitha Admissibility of: Application for settlement-Condition precedent: Disclosure of income not discovered by AO, Unexplained cash credits added to income-AY 1998-99. In assessment the AO had made addition of Rs.1.72 crores under s.68 as unexplained cash credits. The application for settlement disclosing [LexDoc Id : 359846]
HC (Chennai) 2007
Covanta Samalpatti Operating (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 342742]
ITAT (Chennai) 2007
Madan Roller Flour Mills vs CIT Penalty: Delay in filing audit report-Application made for extension of time-The assessee made a request to the AO for extending time for filing return for the reason that the audit report was not ready. No reply to the request [LexDoc Id : 341488]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2007
CIT vs Eicher Goodearth Ltd. Penalty: Concealment of income-Disallowance of claim of deduction or depreciation-AY 1996-97. The assessee had filed full particulars regarding its claim of depreciation and deduction under s.80M. The particulars furnished were not [LexDoc Id : 341261]
HC (Delhi) 2007
ITO vs Amrit Kumar Patel Maintainability of Appeal-Low tax effect-AY 1998-99. The tax effect being law, the appeal by the department was not maintainable since CBDT’s instructions under s.119 were binding on the depa [LexDoc Id : 338099]
ITAT (Delhi) 2007
Asia Power Projects (P) Ltd. vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 336058]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2007
Anwar Pasha vs CIT Appeal to High court-Considering Supreme Court's judgement-The High Court was directed for giving a fresh decision as per law in the light of the judgment in: [289 ITR 341 (SC)].

S.260A of the Incom [LexDoc Id : 335309]
SC 2007
CIT vs Air Liquide India Holding (P) Ltd. Appeal to High court-Substantial question of law: Delayed deposit of TDS-The assessee had deducted TDS on salary paid but deposited it only after a survey under s.133A was conducted. The question whether penalty-interest wa [LexDoc Id : 335308]
SC 2007
CIT vs Birla International (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 331130]
HC (Bombay) 2007
CIT vs Income Tax Settlement Commission and J. Jayalalitha Maintenance of: Application of settlement-No additional income declared before settlement commission-AY 1998-99. The assessee did not disclose any additional income i.e. income which was not disclosed before the AO or the income which was not discover [LexDoc Id : 330853]
HC (Chennai) 2007
CIT vs Asian Hotels Ltd. Benefit from business-Notional interest-The notional interest on refundable deposit received from the tenant could not be assessed as business income under s.28(iv) of the Income Tax Act 196 [LexDoc Id : 330637]
HC (Delhi) 2007
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Industrial Tribunal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 350063]
HC (Kerala) 2007
Archaeological Deptt. of India and Anr. vs Dinesh Chand [LexDoc Id : 350021]
SC 2007
Vemanna Reddy (HUF) vs ITO Accrual of: capital gains-Date of transfer: Development agreement-AY 1998-99. The assessee had entered in to a joint development agreement of property with a builder. The vacant plot was handed over to the builder on [LexDoc Id : 335991]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2007
Finance Officer, Maharishi Dayanand University vs ITO TDS: Value of perks-Accomodation at concessional rent-The assessee was charging standard rent from its employees who were allotted accomodation. The rent was charged at five percent of the basic pay. In e [LexDoc Id : 335085]
ITAT (Delhi) 2007
Escorts Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 333568]
ITAT (Delhi) 2007
Hughes Escorts Communication Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 333399]
ITAT (Delhi) 2007
DCM Technologies Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 333156]
ITAT (Delhi) 2007
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last