| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2802 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CIT vs Amar Tea Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 330850]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2007 |
Deva Metal Powders (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Trade Tax
Rectification of mistake-Existence of apparent error-The power to rectify a mistake within an order deals with only an apparent error and does not deal with rectification of debatable issues or cases whe [LexDoc Id : 329876]
|
SC |
2007 |
ACIT vs Satish .T. Mehta
[LexDoc Id : 336674]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
CIT vs Tarapore and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 330914]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
Bhagat Singh vs Chief Information Commissioner and Ors.
Disclosure of information-Tenability of refusal to furnish the information-An order of the Chief Information Commission (CIC) withholding the information sought by the petitioner until tax recovery orders were made was set as [LexDoc Id : 330802]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
CIT vs Emerald International Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 330753]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2007 |
Centre for Environment Law, World Wide Fund-India vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 452837]
|
SC |
2007 |
Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 368683]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. vs DCIT
Powers of CIT (Appeals)-Admission of additional evidence-The assess had filed a certificate from the Chartered Accountant dated 23 November 1989. Another certificate from the same Chartered Accountant dated [LexDoc Id : 341107]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Sajjan Mills Ltd.
Genuineness of: Business expenditure-Sales-commission or brokerage paid-AY 1993-94. The assessee had filed details of the sales on which commission or brokerage was paid. The payment was made as per trade practice on the b [LexDoc Id : 339015]
|
ITAT (Indore) |
2007 |
ECD Electronics and Electrolysis (P) Ltd. vs CIT
Interest on borrowed capital: Purchase of shares-Profits from sale of shares assessed as business income-AY 1995-96. The assessee had used funds borrowed on interest for investment in shares. Though in the books of accounts the shares were shown as inv [LexDoc Id : 338457]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Ajanta Pharma Ltd.
Computation of: book profits-Deductions under s.80HHC-AY 2001-02. The book-profits computed as per s.115JB(2) are to be reduced by the amount eligible for deduction under s.80HHC not withstanding the perc [LexDoc Id : 338456]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ECS Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 336429]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd.
Fee for: Professional or technical services-Payment to contractor for: Rendering technical services-AY 1999-2000. The assessee made payments to a contractor for fabrication of chilled water line, work order for insulation, conversion of Partially Ori [LexDoc Id : 335873]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Sheela Securities (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Validity of: Revision by CIT-AO taking a possible view-The assessee was working as a sub-broker and also dealing in shares on its own. The AO allowed entire administrative expenses against income from brok [LexDoc Id : 335735]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
ACIT vs British Airways Plc
[LexDoc Id : 335726]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
Span Foundation vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 335218]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
DCIT vs British Bank of Middle East
Interest paid on portfolio management services-Interest paid in excess of RBI’s guidelines-The assessee took certain amounts from some parties under the portfolio management services scheme (PMS). It had promised interest to those parties at [LexDoc Id : 333943]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2007 |
Komal Exports vs ACIT
Deductions: Income from exports-Enhancement of business income-The assessee had returned a loss from exports. The AO assessed the income at a positive figure. The deduction under s.80HHC was to be recomputed on ba [LexDoc Id : 333736]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
VAN OORD ACZ India (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
TDS: Payment to non-resident-Payment for execution of contract, Effect of: Non deduction of tax at source-The assessee was a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company,VOAMC of Netherlands. The assessee entered in to a contract with AO for dredging contract. To [LexDoc Id : 333154]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Nestle India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 333153]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
ACIT vs Prabhu Spg. Mills (P) Ltd.
Business expenditure-Replacement of manual cone winders with auto-cone winders-AY 2002-03. The assessee was running a textile mill. The expenses on replacement of manual cone winders with auto cone winders was deductible as reven [LexDoc Id : 332725]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Jaya Publications vs DCIT/ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 332552]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
DCIT vs Jaya Publications
Condonation of delay-Negligence of the Department-The department filed appeals after inordinate delay of seven years. The delay was due to negligence and inaction on part of authorities. The delay cou [LexDoc Id : 332453]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2007 |
Medicare Investments Ltd. vs JCIT
Business loss-Loss on sale of non-convertible debentures-AY 1996-97. The assessee was allotted certain NCDs of M Ltd. at price of Rs. 250 each. The NCDs were allotted with detachable warrants. As per the ter [LexDoc Id : 331820]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2007 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
