| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3219 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ganesh Housing Corpn. Ltd. vs ACIT
Computation of book-profits-Deduction under s.80IB-AY 2004-05 and AY 2005-06. In computation of 'books-profits' under s.115JB, the deduction under s.80-IB could not be reduced.
S.115JB and s.8 [LexDoc Id : 371434]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2008 |
Hari Shanker Agrawal vs ITO
Unexplained investment-Estimate of cost of construction-Applicability of PWD rates
Reduction of supervision charges
AY 2005-06. On reference under s.142A, the DVO determined the cost of const [LexDoc Id : 362981]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2008 |
Sri Saraswathy Tex vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 362890]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
CIT vs Integrated Databases India Ltd.
Export oriented unit-Belated filing of audit report-The audit report under s.10B(5) was not filed along with the return but was filed during the assessment proceedings. The deductions under s.10B could [LexDoc Id : 362646]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Saffron Investment Ltd. vs ACIT
Speculation loss-Company dealing in shares-Whether part of the business of the assessee company consisted in dealing in shares or whether it was the entire business of the company, the loss fro [LexDoc Id : 360295]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Mother Dairy India Ltd. vs ITO
TDS: Commission vs Discount on sale price-Principal to Principal transactions-AY 2004-05. The assessee was selling milk and milk products through concessionaires. The assessee charged price less item MRP from concessionaires. Th [LexDoc Id : 360293]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
CIT vs Axis Computers India (P) Ltd.
Undertaking in Free trade zone-Filing of prescribed Audit-Report-The provisions of s.10A(5) i.e. filing of prescribed Audit-Report with the Return are directory and not mandatory.
The assessee had filed the pres [LexDoc Id : 360281]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
South India Corpn. Ltd. vs CIT
Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998-Pending of Reference-AY 1992-93 to 1994-95. The Tribunal had filed Draft Statement on 7 November 1998 of the case. The said Draft Statement did not contain the issue raise [LexDoc Id : 360151]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Motor Industries Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 360059]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Supreme Industries Ltd.
Penalty: Concealment of income-Wrong claim of deduction-AY1997-98. Another company AKSF was amalgamated with the assessee w.e.f. 1 April 1991. The benefit of unabsorbed investment allowance of AKSF had laps [LexDoc Id : 359473]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
S.V. Hariprasad vs ITO
Genuineness of Agricultural income-Evidence of agricultural income-AY 2004-05. The assessee owning agricultural land allowed one Patil to grow asparagus on his land on payment of Rs.5000 per day. The receipts from Pat [LexDoc Id : 359247]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Samsons Distilleries (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 358411]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
Birla Global Finance Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 358407]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
ITO vs Modi Motors
Interest paid to partner-Debit balance of partner-The assessee firm had neither charged interest on debit balance of its partners nor had paid interest on their credit balances. The partnership deed h [LexDoc Id : 357062]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Gayaram Chiney Deb Prasad Chiney vs ITO
Validity of: Revision by CIT-Assessment after due enquiries-AY 2003-04. The AO had made the assessment after scrutiny of books of accounts impounded during survey and considering the stock-in-hand found on phys [LexDoc Id : 356228]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2008 |
DCIT vs ICICI Venture Funds Management Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 355306]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
Chand Parkash VIJ vs CIT
Appeal to High court-Genuineness of Cash Credit-AY 1998-99. The tribunal had held that the cash credit was not explained. It was a finding of fact. No question of law arose.
S.68 and 260A o [LexDoc Id : 354233]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
CIT vs Hazari Lal
Appeal to High court-Finding of Undisclosed Income, Inference from seized documents-Block period ending 29 September 1998. The Tribunal on appreciation of evidence found in search had upheld only part of income as "Undisclosed Income" [LexDoc Id : 354121]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
CIT vs Web Commerce India (P) Ltd.
Export oriented unit-Filing of Audit report, Belated filing of audit report-The provisions of s.10B(5) regarding filing of audit report with the return of income were directory and not mandatory.
The assessee had filed the [LexDoc Id : 354076]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. Ltd. vs Manickam and Labour Court, Salem
[LexDoc Id : 352805]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpn. Ltd. vs M. Murugayan and Labour Court, Salem
[LexDoc Id : 352804]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
K. Ambalanatha Doss vs Kanyakumari District Central Co-op Bank and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Tirunelveli
[LexDoc Id : 352802]
|
HC (Madras) |
2008 |
CIT vs Rani Shankar Mishra
Profits in lieu of salary-Compensation awarded for denial of a job-AY 2003-04 and 2004-05. The assessee was denied the job being a woman like other similar women. Since there was discrimination on the ground of sex, t [LexDoc Id : 352740]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Dockyard Employees Union vs Mazgaon Dock Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 352706]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Mahavir Singh vs Khiali Ram and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 352372]
|
SC |
2008 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
