Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3219   
Title Forum  Year
Balasaheb Desai Sahakari S.K. Ltd. vs Kashinath Ganapati Kambale [LexDoc Id : 352371]
SC 2008
Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs National Panasonic India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 352369]
SC 2008
Concept and Devices vs State of Tamil Nadu [LexDoc Id : 405951]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Manju vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 374540]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Moola Ram vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 374456]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Karuna vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 374233]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Anjana Dadhich vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 373163]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Amarnath Baijnath Gupta and Anr. vs Mohini Organics (P) Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 363178]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Ashok Jindal vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 362704]
CAT (Delhi) 2008
Chemet vs Addl. CIT Capital Receipts-Non-compete fee-While terminating agency of D Ltd. the assessee also entered into a non-compete covenant with D Ltd.
The 25 per cent of compensation attributable [LexDoc Id : 357595]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
CIT vs Sesa Goa Ltd. Business expenditure-Customary bonus-AY 1985-86. The customary bonus paid in excess of the bonus payable under the payment of Bonus Act was allowable as business expenditure.

S.3 [LexDoc Id : 356846]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Jyoti Chemicals vs DCIT Condonation of delay-Inordinate delay-AY 1986-87 to 1992-93. The appeals to the Tribunal were filed after inordinate delay of over seven years. There was no reasonable cause for the delay. [LexDoc Id : 356640]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2008
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 354074]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd. vs State of Kerala and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352615]
HC (Kerala) 2008
Shri Basaveshwar Co-op Credit Society Ltd. vs Jayant Shivpal Banchhode, Dilip Shivpal Banchhode, Jagdish Oil Mill and Shakuntala Shivpal Banchhode [LexDoc Id : 352248]
HC (Bombay) 2008
State of Bihar and Ors. vs Pandey Jagdishwar Prasad [LexDoc Id : 352240]
SC 2008
CIT vs Indian Toners and Developers Ltd. Business expenditure-Enhancement in liability due to exchange rate-AY 2001-2002. The enhancement in liability to pay interest on External Commercial Borrowings [ECB], due to change in rate of Exchange was deductible a [LexDoc Id : 397759]
HC (Delhi) 2008
CIT vs Venad Conductors (P) Ltd. Head of Income-Interest on deposits-The interest on short-term deposits was assessable under s.56 and not under s.28.
S.28 and s.56 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 396516]
HC (Kerala) 2008
CGT vs Om Parkash Munjal Revocable gift-Revocable gift and bonus shares-A revocable gift was not void for levy of gift-tax. The bonus shares issued after revocation of the gift continued to remain the property of the donee [LexDoc Id : 394582]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
Tola Ram vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 376204]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
CIT vs Santhi Chitties (P) Ltd. Appeal to High court-Court fee payable-AY 2000-01. The court fee payable in case of appeal to high court in a case under Income Tax Act 1961, or under Interest Tax Act was Rs.500.

[LexDoc Id : 372988]
HC (Kerala) 2008
CIT vs Mohan's Enterprises Head of Income-Income from property vs Business income-The assessee had let out its house property. It received separate charge from tenants for certain services provided and for use of lift. In absence of [LexDoc Id : 370717]
HC (Kerala) 2008
CIT vs Venad Conductors (P) Ltd. Income from other sources-Interest on short term deposits-The interest earned on short term deposits was assessable as income from 'other sources' and not as business income.

S.28 and s.56 of the Inc [LexDoc Id : 365158]
HC (Kerala) 2008
A.B. Hotels Ltd. vs CIT Rectification of mistake-Rectification vis-a-vis making explicit what was implicit in original order-AY 1994-95 to 2000-01. In order under s.254(1) the Tribunal remitted the case to the AO for passing fresh orders under s.201 with the observation that [LexDoc Id : 360436]
HC (Delhi) 2008
JSRS Udyog Ltd. vs ITO Validity of re-assessment-Non-failure to disclose material facts-AY 2001-02. In original assessment the AO had accepted the receipt of share application money on the basis of affidavits and documentary evidence file [LexDoc Id : 354291]
HC (Delhi) 2008
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last