Register free! 
Banking - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 3280   
Title Forum  Year
Neeru Agarwal, Indian Ceramic House, O.P. Agarwal and Aneel Agarwal vs UOI Finality of: Orders of settlement commission-No addition to income by AO-The settlement commission had determined the undisclosed income of the assessee. Therefore, no notice under s.142(1), r.w.s. 153A could be served on t [LexDoc Id : 379272]
HC (Allahabad) 2009
V. Bhaskaran vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 378377]
HC (Delhi) 2009
Tilotama Redkar @ Shakuntala Naik vs Central Bank of India, R.V.S. Fisheries (P) Ltd., Suresh Laxman Redkar, Ratnakar Chopdekar, Vinod Shiva Halarnkar, Ratan Ratnakar Chopdekar, Suresh D. Naik, Recovery Officer and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 378362]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Surayya Shaheen Gous Mohiuddin vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 378331]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Nancy Krafts (P) Ltd. vs ACIT [LexDoc Id : 414634]
ITAT (Delhi) 2009
Modi Nagar Paper Mills Ltd. vs DCIT and Anr. Computation of: special deduction-Brought forward loss-AY 1987-1988. For computing income to grant relief under s.80HHC etc. the brought forward loss and deficiencies of earlier were to be adjusted first.< [LexDoc Id : 403387]
HC (Allahabad) 2009
Chief CIT and Anr. vs Jimmichan M. Varicatt Waiver of interest under s.234A-Condition precedent-On surrender of tenancy right the assessee received compensation and filed the return voluntarily. The CCIT granted waiver of interest under s.234A Fo [LexDoc Id : 402882]
HC (Kerala) 2009
G.T.N. Textiles Ltd. vs DCIT Capital expenditure-Share issue expenses-AY 1993-1994. The expenses incurred on issue of shares were capital expenditure even if the share capital raised was for acquiring shares of a subsidi [LexDoc Id : 397717]
HC (Kerala) 2009
CIT vs R.M.S. Trust Registration of: Charitable trust-Non-production of: amended Trust-deed-The registration under s.12AA and approval under s.80G could not be denied for the only reason of non-production of amended trust deed.
S.12A, s. [LexDoc Id : 397711]
HC (Chennai) 2009
Anand Flori Farms India (P) Ltd. vs ITO Appeal to Tribunal- Duty of Tribunal-Proper opportunity to appellant-Ay-1995-1996 to 1998-1999. At time of hearing the advocate of assessee was not available. It’s M.D. argued but could not present case properly being n [LexDoc Id : 394109]
HC (Delhi) 2009
ACIT vs Metro Ispat (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 385536]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2009
Chander Kant vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 384005]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2009
Ashwani Chopra vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 383968]
SC 2009
Climate Systems India Ltd. vs ACIT

ACIT vs Climate Systems India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 382824]
ITAT (Delhi) 2009
Global Vantedge (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Income derived from Eligible Unit-Interest on FDRs for bank guarantee-AY 2003-04 and 2004-05. The interest earned on FDRs made for bank guarantee to purchase computers was not entitled for special deduction and so was [LexDoc Id : 379789]
ITAT (Delhi) 2009
Swati Synthetics Ltd. vs ITO Depreciation of: Block of assets-Non-use of an asset in block-AY 2001-2002. The depreciation is allowable on all assets in a block and even on an asset in the block which was not used during the year. The block o [LexDoc Id : 379208]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2009
E.E. Minor Irrigation Banda vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 379169]
HC (Allahabad) 2009
Gauri Deepak Patel and Ors. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 378354]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Ramprakash Gulati and Kewal K. Gulati vs State [LexDoc Id : 378326]
HC (Bombay) 2009
G. Authithan vs State of Tamil Nadu [LexDoc Id : 413329]
HC (Chennai) 2009
H.P. Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. vs CIT Deduction on actual payment-Law-applicable-Amendment w.e.f. 01-04-2004-AY 2002-2003 and 2003-2004. The assessee deposited contributions to E.P.F. within the time allowed under s.139(1) but beyond the time under E.P.F. Act [LexDoc Id : 399135]
HC (Himachal Pradesh) 2009
CIT vs South Indian Bank Ltd. Deferment of hearing of appeal-Issue pending before Supreme Court-The issue concerned large number of assessees viz bank. It arises on year to year basis. On D.B. had doubted the correctness of view of another D.B. w [LexDoc Id : 393395]
HC (Kerala) 2009
CIT vs Ansal Properties and Industries [LexDoc Id : 384338]
HC (Delhi) 2009
CIT vs Percy Batlivala [LexDoc Id : 383405]
ITAT (Delhi) 2009
CIT vs Saran Engg. Co. [LexDoc Id : 379914]
HC (Allahabad) 2009
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last