First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 3280 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Neeru Agarwal, Indian Ceramic House, O.P. Agarwal and Aneel Agarwal vs UOI
Finality of: Orders of settlement commission-No addition to income by AO-The settlement commission had determined the undisclosed income of the assessee. Therefore, no notice under s.142(1), r.w.s. 153A could be served on t [LexDoc Id : 379272]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
V. Bhaskaran vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 378377]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Tilotama Redkar @ Shakuntala Naik vs Central Bank of India, R.V.S. Fisheries (P) Ltd., Suresh Laxman Redkar, Ratnakar Chopdekar, Vinod Shiva Halarnkar, Ratan Ratnakar Chopdekar, Suresh D. Naik, Recovery Officer and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 378362]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Surayya Shaheen Gous Mohiuddin vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 378331]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Nancy Krafts (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 414634]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Modi Nagar Paper Mills Ltd. vs DCIT and Anr.
Computation of: special deduction-Brought forward loss-AY 1987-1988. For computing income to grant relief under s.80HHC etc. the brought forward loss and deficiencies of earlier were to be adjusted first.< [LexDoc Id : 403387]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Chief CIT and Anr. vs Jimmichan M. Varicatt
Waiver of interest under s.234A-Condition precedent-On surrender of tenancy right the assessee received compensation and filed the return voluntarily. The CCIT granted waiver of interest under s.234A Fo [LexDoc Id : 402882]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
G.T.N. Textiles Ltd. vs DCIT
Capital expenditure-Share issue expenses-AY 1993-1994. The expenses incurred on issue of shares were capital expenditure even if the share capital raised was for acquiring shares of a subsidi [LexDoc Id : 397717]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
CIT vs R.M.S. Trust
Registration of: Charitable trust-Non-production of: amended Trust-deed-The registration under s.12AA and approval under s.80G could not be denied for the only reason of non-production of amended trust deed.
S.12A, s. [LexDoc Id : 397711]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Anand Flori Farms India (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Appeal to Tribunal- Duty of Tribunal-Proper opportunity to appellant-Ay-1995-1996 to 1998-1999. At time of hearing the advocate of assessee was not available. It’s M.D. argued but could not present case properly being n [LexDoc Id : 394109]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
ACIT vs Metro Ispat (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 385536]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Chander Kant vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 384005]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Ashwani Chopra vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 383968]
|
SC |
2009 |
Climate Systems India Ltd. vs ACIT
ACIT vs Climate Systems India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 382824]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Global Vantedge (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
Income derived from Eligible Unit-Interest on FDRs for bank guarantee-AY 2003-04 and 2004-05.
The interest earned on FDRs made for bank guarantee to purchase computers was not entitled for special deduction and so was [LexDoc Id : 379789]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Swati Synthetics Ltd. vs ITO
Depreciation of: Block of assets-Non-use of an asset in block-AY 2001-2002. The depreciation is allowable on all assets in a block and even on an asset in the block which was not used during the year. The block o [LexDoc Id : 379208]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
E.E. Minor Irrigation Banda vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 379169]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Gauri Deepak Patel and Ors. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 378354]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Ramprakash Gulati and Kewal K. Gulati vs State
[LexDoc Id : 378326]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
G. Authithan vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 413329]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
H.P. Tourism Development Corpn. Ltd. vs CIT
Deduction on actual payment-Law-applicable-Amendment w.e.f. 01-04-2004-AY 2002-2003 and 2003-2004. The assessee deposited contributions to E.P.F. within the time allowed under s.139(1) but beyond the time under E.P.F. Act [LexDoc Id : 399135]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2009 |
CIT vs South Indian Bank Ltd.
Deferment of hearing of appeal-Issue pending before Supreme Court-The issue concerned large number of assessees viz bank. It arises on year to year basis. On D.B. had doubted the correctness of view of another D.B. w [LexDoc Id : 393395]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
CIT vs Ansal Properties and Industries
[LexDoc Id : 384338]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
CIT vs Percy Batlivala
[LexDoc Id : 383405]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
CIT vs Saran Engg. Co.
[LexDoc Id : 379914]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|