First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 3219 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ashoka Info (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
Intangible assets-Depreciation on intangible asset, Right to collect toll-AY 2003-04. The assessee had constructed a road on build, operate and transfer (BOT) basis. It was given a right to collect 'toll for a period of 16 y [LexDoc Id : 365355]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2008 |
Gurdaspur Co-op Sugar Mills vs DCIT and Batala Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd. vs ACIT
Accrual of income-Conversion of loan into grants of the Income Tax Act 1961-The income on account of conversion of loan into grant accrued in the year of conversion into grant.
S.5 of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 364055]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Suman Construction
Salary to partners-Salary authorised by Partnership Deed, Non-Specification of quantification of salary-AY 1999-2000 and 2000-01. The Partnership Deed of the assessee from authorised payment of salary tot he working partners. Once the Partnership Deed au [LexDoc Id : 362163]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2008 |
V. Ramachandran vs Addl. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 360674]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
Om Metals Infraprojects Ltd. vs CIT
[LexDoc Id : 359731]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2008 |
DCIT vs Dolphin Drilling Ltd.
Disallowance of: business expenditure-Delay in payment of TDS-AY 2004-05. The assessee had deducted and paid TDS on salaries paid to non-resident employees. However, the TDS made was paid beyond the time prescrib [LexDoc Id : 359239]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. India Ltd vs ITO
Powers of Tribunal-Allowing respondent to raise a ground adverse to appellant-Where the respondent had not filed an appeal or a cross-objection, the tribunal could not allow him to raise a ground adverse to the appellants. LexDoc Id : 355677]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 354783]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Himalaya Distributors vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 376101]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2008 |
ITO vs Tarsem Singh
Validity of second notice of re-assessment-Pendency of proceedings-AY 1994-95. The assessee filed a return in response to notice under s.148 on 6 December 2000. While the assessment on return filed on 6 December 2000 [LexDoc Id : 365037]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2008 |
Sunanda Capital Services Ltd. vs JCIT
Bar for carry forward of unabsorbed loss-Change in shareholding-AY 1998-99. To apply the bar under S.79 what was to be seen was the pattern of shareholding and change in share holding and not the change in manageme [LexDoc Id : 360480]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2008 |
ITO vs Barbara Thelma Gill
[LexDoc Id : 358849]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Baldev Raj Charla and Ors.
Unexplained: Cash deposits-Amounts withdrawn from bank and firm-The deposits made out of withdrawals from the bank and from the assessee's concern could not be held as unexplained.
S.69 of the Income Tax A [LexDoc Id : 361569]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
ITO vs Banyan Chemicals (P) Ltd.
Income derived from exports-Exchange gains on remittance from EEFC accounts-The exchange gains accrued on remittance from EEFC account was not income derived from exports and so were not entitled to deduction under s.10B. [LexDoc Id : 360999]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2008 |
AKK Specific Family Trust vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 360319]
|
ITAT (Chennai) |
2008 |
Mayawati vs CIT
Validity of: Revision by CIT-Genuineness of gift-AY 2003-04. The AO had accounted the gift received by assessee as genuine after a detailed enquiry and investigation. Further, the assessment was made [LexDoc Id : 356337]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
Sedco Forex International Inc. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 356078]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2008 |
Maruti Countrywide Auto Financial Services Ltd. vs ITO
Chargeable interest-Financial lease vs. Operational lease-AY 1998-99. The assessee was in the business of finance lease and not operational lease. The interest earned on finance lease was chargeable under the [LexDoc Id : 354853]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
DDIT vs Society for the Poor and Oppressed
[LexDoc Id : 384088]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Sarv Prakash Kapoor
Cash Credits: Gift from brother-Genuineness of gift-The assessee had received a gift of Rs.6.65 lakhs from his brother who was also an assessee and had sufficient annual income. The donor also explained [LexDoc Id : 368467]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2008 |
ITO vs Laxmi Narain Ramswaroop Shivhare
Estimate of income-Cash sales made-AY 2001-02. The assessee was selling country liquor and IMFL. All the sales were made in cash. The purchases made were supported by valid documents. T [LexDoc Id : 367084]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2008 |
ACIT vs Ravi Agricultural Industries
Unexplained investments-Jotting on loose paper: Dumb documents-
During the survey under s.133A certain loose papers were found with some numerical entries made thereon. One partner of the assessee firm agreed to [LexDoc Id : 362488]
|
ITAT (Agra) |
2008 |
Godam Nagesh vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 361876]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2008 |
KBC Pictures vs A.R. Murgadoss and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 353758]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Mahak Singh vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 415307]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2008 |
|
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|