| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 6202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ITO vs Vishnu Constructions
Vishnu Constructions vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 508067]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Vijay Infotech Ventures vs CIT
CIT vs Vijay Infotech Ventures
[LexDoc Id : 508066]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Vesuvious India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507592]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
DCIT(IT) vs V. Sandhya Reddy
[LexDoc Id : 507591]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Shraddha Estate vs ITO
Double deduction-Other expenses-Whether, claim of deduction under head "other expenses as sought by appellant/assesse should be allowed. Held, assessee in instant case has debited a [LexDoc Id : 507482]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
Shah Construction vs Add. CIT
DCIT vs Shah Construction
[LexDoc Id : 507481]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
Satya Prakash Agarwal vs ITO
Levy of penalty-Section 274 and Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Concealment of income.-Whether, in absence of specific charge raised by AO in notice under Section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c), levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) not valid . [LexDoc Id : 507480]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Sai Baba Sales (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507478]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2016 |
ITO vs Rancure Investments Pvt Ltd.
Deletion of addition-Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961.Amount of investment.-Whether, CIT(A) erred in deleting additions made under Section 68 of without appreciating fact that shares applicant companies did not possess financi [LexDoc Id : 507393]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Mula Chandra Mohan Goud vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507364]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs M. Laxman Reddy
[LexDoc Id : 507362]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Hyderabad Race Club
Hyderabad Race Club vs ACIT and DCIT
Depreciation-Block of asset-Whether, action of AO in allowing depreciation was justified. Held, if depreciation was allowed at 60%, categorising such equipment as 'computer syste [LexDoc Id : 507360]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Arpan Waghray and Aditya Waghray
Arpan Waghray and Aditya Waghray vs ACIT
Value of sale price-Re-calculation-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case issue should be remitted back to AO for recalculation. Courts have held that in case comparable cases are [LexDoc Id : 507356]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Vijaya Bhavani Constructions (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507065]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs Pericherla Shiva Kumar Raju
[LexDoc Id : 507062]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
P. Gopal Reddy vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507059]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ITO vs Neelima Estates (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507058]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
K.V.K. Kishore Babu Babu Shankarpally vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 507056]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
Joseph Ratna Kumar vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 507055]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2016 |
ACIT vs Ghanshyam Das Manohar Lal
[LexDoc Id : 507054]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Raj Kumar Babutta
Raj Kumar Babutta vs Pr. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 507367]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Sujag Fine Chemicals (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Validity of Notice-Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessment.-Petitioner sought to quash and set aside impugned notice by which AO in exercise of powers under Section 147 of Act has sought to reopen assessment. W [LexDoc Id : 507333]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Gopi Bai Foundation vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 507172]
|
ITAT (Jaipur) |
2016 |
Goldstar Finvest (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507171]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
DCIT vs Crescent Finstock Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 506930]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
