| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 3373 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
ADM Agro Industries Latur and Vizag (P) ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 593110]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
DCIT and ACIT vs Hughes Communication India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 588938]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
DCIT vs Pfizer Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 588935]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2021 |
Sameer Granites (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 591763]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Upendra Reddy Tanguturu vs ITO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 591191]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2021 |
Mamatha Divakar Shetty vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 588934]
|
ITAT (Hyderabad) |
2021 |
Riba Textiles Ltd. vs CCE and ST, Panchkula
[LexDoc Id : 587353]
|
CESTAT (Chandigarh) |
2021 |
Biocon Ltd. vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 591757]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Synamedia Ltd. [formerly known as 'NDS Ltd.'] vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 588849]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Pr. CIT vs Keshav Dutt Shreedhar
[LexDoc Id : 591354]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2021 |
Poonam Mittal vs ITO
[LexDoc Id : 591755]
|
ITAT (Amritsar) |
2021 |
Becon Constructions (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 591751]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Placid Ltd. vs ACIT, DCIT and Ors.
Validity of reopening notice-Sections 147, 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Petitioner has challenged assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 by respondent/AO and validity of impugned notice under [LexDoc Id : 591357]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2021 |
Essjay Ericsson (P) Ltd. vs CIT and Ors.
Refund of excess tax-Sections 245 and 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Adjustment of refunds-Petitioner sought refund of Rs. 6,05,46,907/- which was recovered in excess of 20% of total disputed tax demand for Assessment Year 2016-17 against re [LexDoc Id : 591356]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2021 |
More Credit Securities (P) Ltd. vs ITO
ITO vs More Credit Securities (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 588833]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Methods India (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 597764]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Wipro GE Healthcare (P) Ltd. vs DCIT
[LexDoc Id : 591752]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2021 |
Bhima Jewels vs Pr. CIT
Validity of assessment-Violation of principle of natural justice-Petitioner is in business of gold and diamond jewellery and is assessee under Act. Petition challenged assessment framed on ground of no hearing. Whet [LexDoc Id : 591355]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2021 |
Murli Industries Ltd. vs ACIT
Validity of reopening notice-Sections 147, 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Power of Assessing Officer-Petitioner-Murli Industries Ltd., is company engaged in business of manufacture and sale of cement. Respondent No. 1-Assessing Officer has issued noti [LexDoc Id : 591353]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2021 |
Reliance Industries Ltd. vs Chief CIT
Rejection of declaration-Section 9(c) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020. Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. Eligibility to file declaration-Petitioner challenged communication dated 25th January 2021 withdrawing earlier communication dated 21st October 2020 wherein petitioner was informed [LexDoc Id : 591351]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2021 |
Goa Industrial Development Corpn. vs Addl. CIT, JCIT, DCIT, ACIT, ITO, National Faceless Assessment Centre and Ors.
Validity of demand notice-Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Opportunity of hearing-Petitioner-Goa Industrial Development Corporation (for the sake of brevity, referred to as the 'GSIDC'), seeks to challenge notice of demand under Sec [LexDoc Id : 591350]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2021 |
Park Pharmaceuticals vs Pr. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 591349]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2021 |
Starline Organics (P) Ltd. vs Pr. CIT
[LexDoc Id : 588831]
|
ITAT (Ahmedabad) |
2021 |
ACIT vs Chadha Power
Disallowance of expenses-Section 40 (a) (i) of the income Tax Act, 1961. Reimbursement of expenses to non resident-Assessee partnership firm engaged in business of supply, installation, commissioning and maintenance of DG sets, power equipments and its spare parts [LexDoc Id : 588812]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
Sunandan Kumar Minocha vs ITO
Denial of deduction-Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Exemption on long term capital gains-Assessee has constructed 4 flats consisting of 4 units. Assessee claimed deduction under section 54 which resulted into 'nil' long term capital gain. [LexDoc Id : 588809]
|
ITAT (Delhi) |
2021 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
