Register free! 
Central Excise - Judgement
[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 1750   
Title Forum  Year
Business Process Outsourcing India (P) Ltd. vs CC and Service Tax [LexDoc Id : 461849]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2013
Rusapi Containers vs Commissioner [LexDoc Id : 462239]
HC (Gujarat) 2013
Visaka Industries Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 472596]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2013
Standard Batteries Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 470565]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2013
Gobind Castings (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 471609]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2013
Madhya Bharat Papers Ltd. vs CCE and C [LexDoc Id : 470567]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2013
Sam Turbo Industries Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax [LexDoc Id : 467054]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2013
CCE vs CESTAT and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 465887]
HC (Madras) 2013
Siemens Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 465870]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2013
CCE vs Alpha Carbonless Paper Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 467056]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2013
Kalai Magal Alloys Steel (P) Ltd. vs CESTAT Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465886]
HC (Madras) 2013
Suraj Prakash vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 471169]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2013
CCE vs Grand Card Industries [LexDoc Id : 467981]
HC (Delhi) 2013
Distant Horizon Orchard (P) Ltd. vs CCE and Ors. Direction to pre-deposit: Non-consideration of existence of fraud, misrepresentation, etc. to invoke extended period-Justification of such invocation or of imposition of 100 percent penalty not considered, Pre-deposit directed without disclosing reasons, Impugned orders set aside-In an appeal against pre-deposit, the high court noted that appellate commissioner had cursorily considered the merits of the case. Whether there was [LexDoc Id : 472044]
HC (Calcutta) 2013
CCE vs Soundararaja Mills Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 470686]
HC (Madras) 2013
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs CST and ors. [LexDoc Id : 462240]
HC (Karnataka) 2013
UOI and Ors. vs Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Modvat credit: Effect of enactment of s.112 of Finance Act 2000-S.112 not having retrospective effect, Interest payable on wrongful availment of credit-Modvat credit of the duty paid on the use of high speed diesel oil was withdrawn by Notification issued on 16 March 1995 as well as a Trade Notice dat [LexDoc Id : 454436]
SC 2013
CCE vs Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 467030]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2013
ACME Ceramics vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 467036]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2013
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 461852]
CESTAT (Chennai) 2013
CCCE vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Maintainability of demand raised under s.11D-Assessee treated as a dealer from initiation of proceedings till conclusion, Appeal dismissed-The tribunal had found that the demand raised by the revenue under s.11D of the Central Excise Act 1944 was not tenable. On appeal, the high court not [LexDoc Id : 461109]
HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2013
CCE vs Fenner India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 473773]
HC (Madras) 2013
CCE vs Fenner India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 471608]
HC (Madras) 2013
CCE vs Tuticorin Alkali Chem. and Fertilizers Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 470227]
GOI 2013
Marathon Electric Motors India Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 461895]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2013
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last