| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 105 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Bijayshree Resources Ltd. vs Subasree Real Estates
Suit for specific performance of contract-Dismissal of Suit-The appellant company/defendant entered into an agreement with the respondent in respect of a land owned by the appellant in which 100 plots were to b [LexDoc Id : 504331]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Kannan vs Sridharan
[LexDoc Id : 504334]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
UOI vs Jayaswals Neco Ltd.
Appropriation of payments towards decretal amount-Validity of arbitration award-The appellant (UOI) and the respondent (JNL) entered into a contract in terms of which JNL agreed to supply and the railways agreed to purchase 7 lakh [LexDoc Id : 504295]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs Sachdeva Metal Works
Validity of arbitration award-Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Setting aside of arbitrator award-Appellants challenged the order wherein their objections against the award under Section 34 of the Act were rejected. Whether, the application for set [LexDoc Id : 504298]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2016 |
UOI vs Consolidated Constructions Consortium Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504332]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Delivery Order-Misuse-Lower Court decreed suit filed by appellant/defendant no. 1 and directed defendants to pay Rs. 35,00,000/- with 12% interest to State of Bihar. Whethe [LexDoc Id : 503639]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Ballarpur Industries Ltd. vs Arjun Gases Ltd. and Ors.
Validity of award-Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Setting aside of award-The appellant challenged the rejection of its objection for setting aside the order under Section 34 of the Act. Whether, the award of the Arbitrator [LexDoc Id : 504285]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
V. Krishnamurthy vs Kasthuri and Sons Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 503601]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Dashrath Bhande vs State of Maharashtra
Discharge from Case-Section 306 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Rejection.-Before framing of charge, applicant moved an application seeking his discharge from the case filed under Section 306 of Code. Trial judge discharge ap [LexDoc Id : 503591]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
P.C. Joshua vs D.S. Constructions (P) Ltd.
Damages for Termination of Services-Dismissal of Suit-Trial Court dismissed suit filed by appellant/plaintiff regarding damages for breach of contract of employment Whether, Trial Court rightly dismissed [LexDoc Id : 503594]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bajrangi Mishra and Ors. vs Shail Kumari Devi and Ors.
Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance of Contract-Order 41 Rule 31 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Matter reconsidered.-Suit filed by appellants/plaintiffs dismissed by Trial Court and affirmed by First Appellate Court regarding specific performance of contract. Whether [LexDoc Id : 503637]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
Prabhata Kumar Pattnaik and Ors. vs Secretary to Govt. of Odisha
[LexDoc Id : 503614]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2016 |
Lafarge India (P) Ltd. vs Emami Realty Ltd. and Ors.
Refused to grant ad interim injunction-Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Cause of action.-Plaintiff/appellant prayed for anti-arbitration injunction, which having been rejected by Trial Judge at ad interim stage. Whether, Trial Judge was ju [LexDoc Id : 503613]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Dhansar Engg. Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 503592]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Tower Vision India (P) Ltd. vs Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
Compensation ascertained-Compliance of Order-Spectrum had been transferred and service is closed. It is true and also admitted by petitioner that said fact can be ascertained by Arbitral Tribunal [LexDoc Id : 503642]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Indus Towers Ltd. vs Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
Interim Measures-Order XXXVIII Rule 5 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Compliance of Order.-Present petition filed to sought interim measure, inter alia, by way of an order or direction to respondent to furnish reasonable security. Whether in [LexDoc Id : 503640]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
State Bank of India vs Malini Manag. and Consultancy (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Dismissal of leave to defend application-Suit for recovery-Whether, the letter issued by the appellant to respondent 2 could be construed as a Bank Guarantee. Held, once irrevocable instructions were issued by [LexDoc Id : 502775]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Siddhivinayak Audyogik Vasahat Maryadit vs Murlidhar Vedu Jadhav and Ors.
Rejection of Submission-Specific Performance-Plaintiff who sought specific performance had to prove that it was ready and willing to perform its part of the obligation under the agreement for pur [LexDoc Id : 502740]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Rajendra Prasad Bakoriya vs Secretary State of Madhya Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 502773]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2016 |
Benara Bearings and Pistons Ltd. vs Mahle Engine Components India (P) Ltd.
Existence of a contract-Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Specific performance of contract-The dispute has been arisen over the existence of contract between Petitioner (Benara) and Respondent (Mahle). Petition filed to restrain the responde [LexDoc Id : 502766]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Iliyas and Ors. vs Ram Dulari and Ors.
Grant of decree for specific performance-Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Bars against suit for specific performance-Whether, the lower appellate Court was justified in law in granting the decree for specific performance of contract, ignoring the provisions of the Sp [LexDoc Id : 502770]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
R. Shanmugam and Ors. vs V. Manoharan
[LexDoc Id : 502772]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Inter Asia Impex vs Freightscan Global Logistics (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502768]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
HCC Van Oord ACZ Joint Venture vs Ennore Port Ltd. and Ors.
Assessment of contractual obligations-Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Setting aside of arbitral award-The contract for quarrying and transporting the rocks from the quarry at Karikkal village near Arakkonam to the Ennore Port site was awarded to M/s. H [LexDoc Id : 502767]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Dinesh Bhardwaj and Ors. vs Janardhan Singh and Ors.
Money Decree-Privity of Contract-Trial Court and First Appellate Court passed money decree for certain sum alongwith pendente lite and future interest @ 18% p.a. Whether, concurrent f [LexDoc Id : 502016]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| |
