| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 105 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
K. Asokan and Ors. vs Ambi and Ors.
Advance Amount-Willing to perform part of contract-Trial court dismissed suit filed by appellants/plaintiffs for recover advance amount with interest by stating that appellants were not ready and willi [LexDoc Id : 502021]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Tushar Gajanan Savlajkar and Ors. vs Life Insurance Corpn. of India
Terms of appointment-Contractual appointment-Whether, respondents was justified in challenging terms of their appointment. Held, respondents at time of appointment have accepted an agreement in a [LexDoc Id : 501815]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Bharat Overseas (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Suchittra Properties (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501802]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs Sujit Kumar Banerjee
Entitlement to receive commission-Section 41 of Insurance Act, 1938. Rebate.-Whether, respondent was entitled to receive commission in respect of mediclaim policy. Held, mediclaim policy was undoubtedly routed through responden [LexDoc Id : 501547]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Sham Pundlalik Dhumatkar and Ors. vs Pushpa Mohanlal Talreja and Ors.
Non-registered document-Section 49 of Registration Act. Maintainability of suit.-Whether, suit was rightly decreed in favour of Respondents even suit in question for specific performance based on document which is unregistered and [LexDoc Id : 501546]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Jayaswals Neco Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Appropriation of payments towards decretal amount-Enforcement of arbitration award-The Decree Holder (JNL) sought to enforce arbitration award. The central controversy relates to the manner in which payments already made by the railw [LexDoc Id : 501509]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Jayaswals Neco Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501155]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Dhanalakshmi Mills Ltd. vs R. Krishnamurthy and Ors.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500825]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Kadali Venu Sankar vs Pydikondala Lakshmi
-- [LexDoc Id : 500827]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Paily and Co. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 500834]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Madhubala and Ors. vs Ram Kauri and Ors.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500829]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Ghansham Dass vs Parkash Devi and Ors.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500826]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Tirumala Seven Hills (P) Ltd. vs Tongyu Communication Inc.
[LexDoc Id : 500204]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Prabhatam Advertising (P) Ltd. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 500197]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Jiten Chandra Ghosh and Ors. vs Nipendra Chandra Ghosh
-- [LexDoc Id : 500192]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Hyundai Rotem Co. vs Delhi Metro Rail Corpn.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500190]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. vs Devender Singh
-- [LexDoc Id : 500189]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Masaurhi Service Station vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
-- [LexDoc Id : 500195]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Renu Sharma vs C.K. Maitra
-- [LexDoc Id : 500199]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
Board of Trustees and Ors. vs India Trident Maritime (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Entitlement to recover demurrage charges: Respondent admittedly steamer agent-Respondents not liable for port charges once bill of lading was endorsed or delivery order was issued-Whether the Kolkata Port Trust (KPT) was entitled to recover demurrage charges from the first respondent in respect of containers in which poppy seed [LexDoc Id : 499585]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Babulal Harchand Beldar and Ors. vs Sitaram Kathu Borse and Ors.
Agreement of sale: Willingness and readiness to perform contract-Execution of agreement not disputed, Suit filed within three years from date of refusal within limitation-Whether the courts below were justified in holding that the suit was not within limitation and that the plaintiff had not proved readiness and willing [LexDoc Id : 499179]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
HDPL Infrastructure Ltd. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
Eligibility and qualification criteria in tender-Joint venture akin to partnership, Respondents directed to evaluate bids accordingly-Whether the challenge to eligibility of fourth and fifth respondents in respect of tenders invited by the official respondents was tenable. The petiti [LexDoc Id : 499182]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Siluvai Rajan vs Glory Stella Bai and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 498610]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Meera Narula vs G.G. Malvankar and Ors.
Decree of specific performance: Respondents by their conduct choosing to abide by agreement to sell-Appellant not responsible for non-execution or delay in execution of sale deed, Direction to pay interest on unpaid consideration amount unjustified-Whether the single judge was justified in holding that the agreement to sell along with suit property were valid documents and directing the appellant [LexDoc Id : 498293]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Twenty First Century Resorts and Ors. vs Shamsher Singh
Entitlement to specific performance of agreement: Period of limitation for registration of sale deed not extended-Concealment of facts from buyer during execution of original contract of sale, Plaintiffs entitled to recovery of earnest money along with interest-Whether the plaintiffs were entitled for specific performance of agreement. Held, It is held that in the original receipt the defendant had simply ack [LexDoc Id : 498317]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| |
