First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 93 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kantaben vs Sarojben Jashubhai Patel and Ors.
Recovery of possession-Unauthorized-Whether, Court below while construing leave and license agreement as a lease agreement committed a gross error. Held, possession which was given initi [LexDoc Id : 511442]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Venkata Rao vs G. Nirmala
Suit for specific performance-Entitlement to equitable relief-Decree of suit for specific performance of contract for agreement for sale of property in favour of plaintiff/Respondent by the Trial Court. Whether, [LexDoc Id : 510386]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
D. Vasanthi vs P. Rajalakshmi and Ors.
Specific performance of contract-Ready and willingness to perform-Decree for specific performance was challenged by Appellant/defendant. Whether, the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance. Held, subsequent c [LexDoc Id : 510389]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Rejection of tender-Scope of Judicial review-The rejection of petitioner tender for the reason that the CBI case was pending against the firm was challenged herein. Whether, the rejection of tend [LexDoc Id : 510388]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. vs Haryana Telecom Ltd.
Interpretation of Clause-Breach of contract-Whether, findings of Arbitral Tribunal was justified or needs to be interfered with. Held, in present case, AT proceeded on erroneous basis that first [LexDoc Id : 510460]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Amira Foods India Ltd. and Ors. vs Board of Trustees of The Port of Kandla/Kandla Port Trust and Ors.
Demurrage charges-Section 56 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Liability to pay.-By impugned decision, petitioners were held jointly and severally liable to pay demurrage charges as demanded in notice issued under Section 56 of MPT [LexDoc Id : 510419]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
C. Indirani vs R. Raju and Ors.
Dismissal of suit for specific performance-Suppression of material facts-This dismissal of the suit filed for specific performance was challenged by Appellant/Plaintiff. Whether, the lower court has rightly dismissed the su [LexDoc Id : 510392]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Tara Chand and Ors. vs Madan Lal
Specific performance of contract-Readiness and willingness to perform contract-Grant of decree in favour of respondent/ plaintiff for specific performance of agreement was challenged by the appellant/defendant. Whether without th [LexDoc Id : 510387]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2017 |
Soundarrajan vs Vettobai and Ors.
Purchase of property-Tainted-Whether, purchase was tainted with collusion and fraud. Held, it is specific case of D.W. 2, that he has purchased 56 cents for valuable consideration [LexDoc Id : 510952]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Sujyoti India (P) Ltd. vs Western Coalfields Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 510013]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
RCM Infrastructure Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 510015]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2017 |
Gopal Chandra Jaiswal vs Birla Tyres and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509677]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Parmod Sood vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
Deviation limit-Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Determination of rates.-Whether, award passed by Arbitrator liable to be dismissed under Section 34 of Act. Held, spite of condition of deviation limit and the determination [LexDoc Id : 509684]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2017 |
National Highways Authority of India vs N.K. Toll Road Ltd.
Extent of judicial review-Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Final adjudication.-Whether, decision of arbitral tribunal held to be perverse. Held, there is no dispute that damages awarded by Arbitral Tribunal are in conformity with [LexDoc Id : 509683]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Fulena Construction (P) Ltd. vs East Central Railway and Ors.
Rescind of contract-Cost component-Petitioner's contract has been rescinded and by letter, risks and costs component in fresh tender notice has been attached on shoulders of petitioner. [LexDoc Id : 509675]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs Shree Ahuja Properties and Realtors (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Invocation of Bank Guarantee.-Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dismissal of petition.-Petition filed by petitioner-appellant under Section 9 of Act dismissed. Whether, bank guarantee in present case should be invoked. Held, bank guarant [LexDoc Id : 509682]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
National Highways Authority of India vs CEC-HCC Joint Venture
[LexDoc Id : 509673]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs Garg Builders
[LexDoc Id : 509466]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Apeejay (P) Ltd. vs Steel Authority of India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509465]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
GAIL India Ltd. vs Osram India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509470]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Punj Lloyd Ltd. vs GVK Power (Goindwal Sahib) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509432]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Greatwall Vanijya Ltd. and Ors. vs Bengal Waterproof Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509411]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
OSS Air Management (P) Ltd. vs S.K. Singh
[LexDoc Id : 509429]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
City Union Bank Ltd. vs Maivasagam
[LexDoc Id : 509422]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Lift and Shift India (P) Ltd. vs Central Warehousing Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 509419]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last |
|