| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 163 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Man Chand Katoch vs Virender Speya
[LexDoc Id : 528189]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Long Island Nature Hotel and Resort (P) Ltd. vs Andaman and Nicobar Islands Integrated Development Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Setting aside of arbitrator award-Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Power of Court-Whether, the award passed by arbitrator rejecting claim of appellant liable to be set aside. Held, evident that principal ground put forth by appellan [LexDoc Id : 527923]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Chauhan Associates vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527539]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Matadi Tradecom (P) Ltd. vs Plastolene Polymers (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 527546]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Ameer Minhaj vs Dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527263]
|
SC |
2018 |
T.S. Viswanathan vs Bank of Baroda and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 526508]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Mathew vs Rajan
[LexDoc Id : 526516]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Socar Turkey Petrol Enerji Dagitim Sav. Ve. Tic. A.S. vs MV Amoy Fortune
[LexDoc Id : 526153]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
Mera Baba (P) Ltd. vs Ram Lubhaya Puri and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 526152]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Metaffinity (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Religare Enterprises Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 526151]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Shoes East Ltd. vs Delhi Development Authority
[LexDoc Id : 525334]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
V. Krishnappa vs J.C. Gangalakshmaiah and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 525332]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
JKM-NKC (JV) vs National Highways Authority of India
Recommendation-Finality-Whether, recommendations of the DRB would be binding till the conclusion of the arbitral proceedings. Held, DRB had recommended payment of certain sum [LexDoc Id : 524837]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
STCI Finance Ltd. vs Cedar Infonet (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 524551]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Ratan Lal vs Om Prakash and Ors.
Part of contract-Termination-Whether, plaintiff has failed to prove his readiness and willingness to perform his part of contract and therefore the courts below have wrongly decre [LexDoc Id : 524830]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
M.P. Power Generation Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs Ansaldo Energia SPA and Ors.
Bank Guarantee-Return of amount-Whether, claim allow by Arbitral Tribunal regarding Bank Guarantee was justified. Held, claimant is entitled for return of amount for which Bank Guara [LexDoc Id : 523834]
|
SC |
2018 |
Sucha Singh Sodhi (Dead) through L.Rs vs Baldev Raj Walia and Ors.
Withdrawal of suit-Order 23 Rule 1(3) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Requisite.-Whether, permission to withdrawal of civil suit should be given in facts and circumstances of case – Held, reading of statement of original Plaintiff [LexDoc Id : 523833]
|
SC |
2018 |
S. Vel Aravind and Ors. vs Radhakrishnan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523861]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Vippy Solvex Products Ltd. vs State Trading Corpn. India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 523562]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
3F Industries Ltd. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 523276]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
North Delhi Municipal Corpn. and Ors. vs Sanjeev Kumar
Pendente lite interest-Security amount-Whether, pendente lite interest is liable to be granted either on the principal or on the security amount as there was no compliance of Clauses 17 and [LexDoc Id : 523614]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Classic Motors (P) Ltd. vs Goyal M.G. Gases (P) Ltd.
License Agreement-Adjustment of amount-Whether, respondent remained in possession of the premises. Held, power of Court under Section 34 of the Act would be confined to only setting aside A [LexDoc Id : 523626]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Golakh Chandra Das vs Braja Kamini Das and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 524001]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2018 |
K. Ummer Haji vs Kunhimoosa and Ors.
Advance Amount-Refund-Whether, plaintiff should be allowed to recover from defendant Rs. 5 lakhs with interest at rate of 12% per annum from date of suit till realisation w [LexDoc Id : 523994]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Vandana Global Ltd. vs IL and FS Financial Services Ltd.
Winding up of the company-Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 126 of the Contract Act. Enforceability of option agreement-Whether, the Single Judge had rightly allowed the respondent's Company Petition filed under Sections 433(e), 434 read with 439 of the Act and directed [LexDoc Id : 522634]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2018 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
| |
