| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 27 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Pepsico Inc. and Ors. vs Sagarnil Enterprise and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 507146]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Piruz Khambatta and Ors. vs Rajmohan Rupaji Modi and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Invoked jurisdiction-Plaintiff sought reliefs in nature of permanent injunction, rendition of accounts, damages etc. it primarily being an action arising out of infringeme [LexDoc Id : 507147]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Raj Television Network Ltd. vs B.R. Andalammal and Ors.
Injunction-Non-filling of original assessment-Present suit filed to sought injunction against defendant regarding copyright viz., world satellite TV rights including India, world TV rights includi [LexDoc Id : 506234]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Asianet Communications Ltd. and Ors. vs SUN T.V. Network Ltd. and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Preponderance of probalities-Plaintiff sought copyright in respect of picture 'AHAM' through Satellite Television and for permanent injunction from in any manner infringing their [LexDoc Id : 506225]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Apex Laboratories Ltd. vs India Pharmaceuticals
Permanent injunction-Infringement of copyright-Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction restraining defendants from committing an infringement of plaintiff's Copy right in artistic work 'ZINCOVIT' la [LexDoc Id : 505952]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Ramu Chellappa vs CBFC and Ors.
Re-censor of movie-Interest of viewers-Petitioner is said to be a script writer and Director of Movie called ENGITTA MODHATHEY, produced by 2nd and 3rd respondents. Petitioner sought direct [LexDoc Id : 505958]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Gurukul Books and Packaging and Ors. vs Evergreen Publications India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 504421]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) vs Aditya Pandey and Ors.
Appeal against Interim Order-Licence-Present appeals being against an interim order. Lyric written by 'X' (lyricist) and music composed by 'Y' (musician) are used to make sound recording [LexDoc Id : 503148]
|
SC |
2016 |
Moserbaer India Ltd. vs Modern Cinema
[LexDoc Id : 504424]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Modern Publishers and Ors. vs Satish Kumar Gupta
Dismissal of application-Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957. Interpretation of agreement.-Additional District Judge dismissed application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. Whether, in facts and circumstances of case Ad [LexDoc Id : 504423]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
University of Oxford and Ors. vs Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Ors.
Permanent injunction-Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Infringement of copyright-The plaintiffs filed suit for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing the copyright of the plaintiffs in their p [LexDoc Id : 503775]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Khushi Ram Behari Lal vs P.V. Kanakaraj Trading as Kalpatharu Trading Co.
[LexDoc Id : 503773]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Balaji Motion Pictures vs Bharath Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 502952]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Castrol Ltd. and Ors. vs Nellai Oil Agency and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 502953]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama vs Ashutosh Gowarikar and Ors.
Prayer for injunction restraining release of film: No certainty in plaintiff's claim-Questions of balance of convenience and irretrievable prejudice favouring defendants, Notice of motion dismissed -
Whether notice of motion seeking an injunction restraining the release of a film directed by the first defendant could be allowed. Held, in the [LexDoc Id : 501198]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Symantec Software Solutions vs R. Modi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 501548]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Music Broadcast Ltd. vs Axis Bank and Ors.
Territorial jurisdiction-Order 7 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.Cause of Action.-Single Judge has directed return of plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC for presentation before High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which, according t [LexDoc Id : 501100]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Abhay Agarwal and Ors. vs Puranmal Goods (P) Ltd.
Passing off, trademark and copyright infringement: Every action in passing off an action in deceit-Defendants having independent registration and use, Adoption of mark not dishonest, No prima facie case made for grant of injunction-
Whether the suit seeking a restraint order against the defendant on a cause of action in passing off in relation to a trade mark combined with a [LexDoc Id : 501194]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Dart Industries Inc. and Ors. vs Techno Plast and Ors.
Infringement of copyright and design-Ad-interim Injunction-Plaintiffs, application for ad-interim injunction during pendency of their suit for copyright and design infringement was dismissed by single judge. W [LexDoc Id : 501101]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
OK Play India Ltd. vs Mayank Aggarwal and Ors.
Interim injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiff filed application for interim injunction and defendants filed applications for vacation of ex parte ad interim injunction granted to the pla [LexDoc Id : 500312]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
M. Radhakrishnan vs Surabhi Publications and Ors.
Permanent prohibitory injunction-Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Piracy-Appellant/plaintiff instituted suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants 1 to 5 from selling, marketing or reprinting the book [LexDoc Id : 500310]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2016 |
Selvel Industries and Ors. vs Om Plast India
Infringement of design-Section 2(d) of Designs Act, 2000. Indistinguishable product-Plaintiffs claimed that Defendant's product was indistinguishable from that of Plaintiffs and that Defendants not only infringed the Plaintiffs' copyr [LexDoc Id : 500315]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
XYZ Films LLC and Ors. vs UTV Motion Pictures/UTV Software Communications Ltd. and Ors.
Copyright infringement: No copyright in central idea or theme of a story or play-Copyright subsisting in combination of situations, events and scenes, Notice of motion dismissed-Whether there was any justification for the grant of injunction for copyright infringement. Held, in general, there was no copyright in the central id [LexDoc Id : 497618]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Shyam Singh vs State
[LexDoc Id : 497616]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
K.M. Varghese vs CBS Publishers and Distributors
[LexDoc Id : 497138]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| |
