Register free! 
Criminal - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Last
Documents Found: 619   
Title Forum  Year
Vivek Anand Singhania vs State of Assam and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 353279]
HC (Gauhati) 2008
Som Mittal vs Govt. of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 338881]
SC 2008
S.K. Sinha vs Videocon International Ltd. and Ors. Issuance of process-Cognizance by a criminal court-Issuance of process by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in a criminal case could not be equated with taking cognizance by a criminal court. [LexDoc Id : 332699]
SC 2008
Provident Fund Inspector vs Bhagi Bai and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 350880]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Raj Kumar Aggarwal vs CE [LexDoc Id : 348400]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Shyamlal Govardhan Lal vs State of Goa [LexDoc Id : 365729]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Dinabandhu Das vs State of West Bengal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 352905]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
Videocon International vs SEBI Offences under SEBI Act 1992-Appropriate court-The complaints under s. 24 of the SEBI Act 1992 pertaining to contravention of the provisions of the said Act, were required to be tried by the court [LexDoc Id : 336726]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Rattiram and Ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh [LexDoc Id : 437357]
SC 2008
Shashi Kant Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi) [LexDoc Id : 364397]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Mahender Singh vs High Court of Delhi and Anr. Cognizance of offences by courts-Complaints filed prior to amendment-The SEBI had filed complaints against the petitioners under s.24(1) and s.27 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992. As per the said p [LexDoc Id : 377005]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Benjamin vs State represented by Inspector of Police [LexDoc Id : 338880]
SC 2008
Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs Dattatraya G. Hegde Evidentiary value of statutory presumption-Determination-The question whether the statutory presumption stood rebutted or not, was to be determined keeping in view the other evidences on record. Where the ch [LexDoc Id : 331988]
SC 2008
Superintendent of Central Excise vs Suresh Mulchand Seth @ Jain [LexDoc Id : 364229]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Kanhaiyalal vs UOI Legality of confession before an officer-Conviction on the basis of confessional statement-An ‘officer’ for the purposes of s.67 read with s.42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 was not a ‘police officer’ and hence a [LexDoc Id : 331756]
SC 2008
K. Pon Venkatesh and Anr. vs Employees' State Insurance Corporation [LexDoc Id : 359424]
HC (Madras) 2008
State of Haryana and Ors. vs Dinesh Kumar Arrest-Benefit of mistaken impression granted to applicant-The Supreme Court held that the fact that a person had never been arrested on his appearing before the Court and granted bail immediately gave the mis [LexDoc Id : 335341]
SC 2008
Pramod Narayan Bandekar and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra [LexDoc Id : 349363]
HC (Bombay) 2008
State of Maharashtra vs Ramanath Gangadhar Pawar [LexDoc Id : 354706]
HC (Bombay) 2008
 
First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | Last