| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1707 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Moti Lal and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 377500]
|
SC |
2009 |
Balaji vs State
[LexDoc Id : 377498]
|
SC |
2009 |
K.M. Ibrahim vs K.P. Mohammed and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 377497]
|
SC |
2009 |
Sukhdeep Singh @ Deep Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 399374]
|
SC |
2009 |
Ramveer vs State NCT of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 378782]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Balkrishna Narayant Gurav and Ors. vs State of Maharshtra and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 378079]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Pooja A. Rawat and Anr. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377658]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs Sant Ram and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377619]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Rajinder and Ors. vs Harsh Vohra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377618]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Ahmednagar Municipal Council vs Dullabhadas Haridas Patel, Jamukubai Haridas Patel, Chandrakant Ramnarayan Kabra, Punamchand Haridas, Ramanlal Hastimal Gandhi and State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 377583]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Satinder Singh @ Sunder vs State
[LexDoc Id : 377512]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Vinod Panjabrao Patil vs Indu Viinod Patil
[LexDoc Id : 377503]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Manoj Bhimrao Wankhede, Veena Sunil Naik and Ramabai Bhimrao Wankhede vs State of Maharashtra and Sandhya Manoj Wankhede
[LexDoc Id : 377502]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Satyawan Nagesh Gaonkar vs Deendayal Nagari Sahakari Pathasanstha Maryadit Co-op. Society and State
[LexDoc Id : 377465]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Meena G. Pandit vs Kishor Rama Satelkar and State
[LexDoc Id : 377463]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Mohd. Rahim and Mazibul Rehman vs State
[LexDoc Id : 377326]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Wahid Khan vs State of Madhya Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 377325]
|
SC |
2009 |
V.S. Gupta vs Punjab National Bank
Person in charge and responsible to the company-Appearance or submission of compromise on behalf of company-A consultant could not be said to be a person in charge of and responsible to the company for conduct of the business of the company. Merely from appe [LexDoc Id : 395522]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
UOI, Addl. Commissioner of Police (Crime) and Institute of Chartered Accountants of India vs Central Information Commission, P.D. Khandelwal, Sweety Kothari, Maj. Raj Pal (Retd.), Bhabaranjan Ray and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 377622]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Yashpal @ Mukesh @ Chattoo vs State
[LexDoc Id : 377621]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Madan Mohan Kesar vs State and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 377572]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Ma-Ma International vs UOI vs Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377508]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Haridas Kisanrao Kharbadkar and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 377460]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Mohd. Farroque vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 377459]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Ajit Singh vs ROC
Power of the court to grant relief in certain cases-Proceedings under Indian Penal Code-An FIR was lodged with the CBI under s.120B, s.420, s.467, s.468, s.471 and s.477A of the Indian Penal Code 1860 against a chartered accountant of the [LexDoc Id : 389522]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
