First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 391 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State of Maharashrta and Anr.
Ordinary place of inquiry and trial-Jurisdiction of court to try offence under s.138-The general rule stipulated under s.177 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 applied to cases under s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. Prose [LexDoc Id : 473879]
|
SC |
2014 |
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 473602]
|
SC |
2014 |
Kabulsing vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 465707]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Durga Burman vs State of Sikkim
[LexDoc Id : 465576]
|
SC |
2014 |
Bairam Muralidhar vs State of Andhra Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 465575]
|
SC |
2014 |
Virender vs State of Himachal Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 465607]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2014 |
Twinkle Jatin Khanna, @ Twinkle Akshay Kumar vs Anita Advani
[LexDoc Id : 465498]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Rafiq, Faruq vs State of Maharashtra, District Superintendent, S.D. Shaikh and Nana Ghuge
[LexDoc Id : 465496]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Laxmi and Anr. vs State
[LexDoc Id : 465495]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Ashish vs Commissioner of Police, State of Maharashtra and Superintendent
[LexDoc Id : 465494]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
State of Himachal Pradesh vs Sanjeev Kumar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 465605]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2014 |
H.M.A. Shaik Mohideen vs ACC
Conviction for offences under s.132 and s.135(1)(b)-Offence under s.135(1)(b) not attracting mandatory minimum sentence as on date of offence, Reduction of sentence, Fine confirmed-The petitioner had been convicted for offences under s.132 and s.135(1)(b) of the Customs Act 1962 sentencing him to undergo six months rigorous impri [LexDoc Id : 473900]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
Subramanian Swamy vs Arun Shourie
Contempt of Courts Act 1971: Term 'court'-Court to have power to give a decision or a definitive judgment having finality and authoritativeness-The term 'court' under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 meant the authority, which had the legal power to give a judgment which, if confirmed by some o [LexDoc Id : 465080]
|
SC |
2014 |
Ramdas Naik vs Krishnanand Naik
[LexDoc Id : 465076]
|
SC |
2014 |
Deva Ram vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465074]
|
SC |
2014 |
Shyam Narain Pandey vs State of Uttar Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 465079]
|
SC |
2014 |
Saurabh Kumar vs Koneila Jail and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465078]
|
SC |
2014 |
Atul Tripathi vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465073]
|
SC |
2014 |
Sushant Gupta vs UOI
Possession of contraband goods established-Presumption in law as regards possession of illicit articles-Once possession was established, the person who claimed that it was not a conscious possession had to establish it, because how he came to be in posse [LexDoc Id : 473480]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2014 |
Sathiyamoorthy and Ors. vs State
[LexDoc Id : 465035]
|
SC |
2014 |
Manohar Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465034]
|
SC |
2014 |
Yogendra Yadav and Ors. vs State of Jharkhand and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 465033]
|
SC |
2014 |
Bhuwan Mohan Singh vs Meena and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 464727]
|
SC |
2014 |
C.K. Dasegowda and Ors. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 464726]
|
SC |
2014 |
State of Bihar and Ors. vs Ashok Kumar Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 464249]
|
SC |
2014 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|