| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Last |
| Documents Found: 65 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
K. Dhanabakkiyam vs Thirumala Wall Decors and Suncontrols and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509750]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
C. Kathirvel vs K.S.V. Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509747]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
S.N. Bansal and Ors. vs NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509444]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
G. Vasantha vs Maharaja Kallash Benefit Fund Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509409]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Surendra Sharma vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Inherent powers of high court: Transfer of case by revisional court-Factual aspects well within the powers of trial court, No justification to interfere-
Whether the petition filed under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 seeking to quash the entire criminal revision proceedings as we [LexDoc Id : 508573]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Buhari Abdul Khader Khalid vs Emirates Trading LLC
[LexDoc Id : 514063]
|
|
2017 |
Ram Ji Gautam vs Abhai Patel
[LexDoc Id : 508374]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Mukesh Kumar vs State and Ors.
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881: Rebuttable presumption under section 139-Defence of accused not at all probabalised, Accused convicted of offence under section 138-
Whether the order acquitting the accused of the offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 on the complaint of the petitioner [LexDoc Id : 508212]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Kirti Premraaj Jain and Ors. vs Moser Baer Clean Energy Ltd. and Ors.
Dishonour of cheques: Existing liability qua against the petitioner(s)-Ingredients of section 138 satisfied, Summoning order not bad-
Whether the summoning orders passed by the metropolitan magistrate and its consequential notices were bad. Held, the cheques issued by the petit [LexDoc Id : 507900]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Munayamma vs Siddamma
Validity of conviction-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Re-appreciation of materials.-Trial Court convicted revision petitioner for offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. First appellate Court also, on re-appreciation of materials [LexDoc Id : 507901]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
India Cements Investments Services Ltd. vs T.P. Nallusamy
Dishonour of cheques: Statement of accounts without signature of respondent-Facts within the knowledge of respondent not spoken in witness box-
Whether the first appellate court had correctly allowed the appeal of the respondent and held him not guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable [LexDoc Id : 507895]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
Punjab National Bank vs Chauhan Tiles Industries and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 515356]
|
DRT |
2017 |
Sanjivbhai Kiritbhai Patel and Ors. vs Biocare Remedies (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Petition barred by limitation-Limitation Act, 1963. Section 10GE of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 433 of the Companies Act, 2013. Applicability of limitation act-Whether, the petition barred by limitation and petitioner not entitled to reliefs prayed. Held, section 433 of that Act, 2013 says that provisions of [LexDoc Id : 514782]
|
|
2017 |
Moirangthem Hemanta Singh vs Ningthoujam Biren Singh
[LexDoc Id : 507842]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2017 |
S. Muniraj vs B.V. Anantharao
[LexDoc Id : 507845]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Last |
| |
