First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 155 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Prem Singh vs Dharam Singh
[LexDoc Id : 534976]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Manmohan Krishan Gupta vs Pawan Jaral
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Presumptions as to negotiable instruments-Whether, cognizance of complaint under Section 138 of Act has been rightly taken and process against petitioner has been rightly issued. Held, procedu [LexDoc Id : 534716]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Jafar Ahamad Khan vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Power of magistrate-Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Taking possession of secured assets-Whether, Trial Court has rightly in exercise of powers under section 14 of Act has directed that possession be taken. Held, from entire body of the wr [LexDoc Id : 534443]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
Abdul Majid Mir vs Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Mir
[LexDoc Id : 534160]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Bashir Ahmad Teli vs Haleema
Dishonour of cheque-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Sections 242, 342 of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973. Examination of accused-Whether, conviction of petitioner for offence under section 138 of Act, justified. Held, Courts below has appreciated evidence on record. Concurrent f [LexDoc Id : 534159]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
K. Nithynanada Shetty vs Vijaya Bhaskara Shetty B.
[LexDoc Id : 534158]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Digvijay Chandra vs Ambrish Vijay Rohal
[LexDoc Id : 533862]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Saravjeet Malhotra vs LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Discharge of legally enforceable debt-Whether, Petitioner has been rightly convicted under Section 138 of Act. Held, from evidence led by respondent, it was evidently clear that it was in [LexDoc Id : 534170]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Sucha Singh vs Inderjit Kaur
Arbitration proceedings barred criminal proceedings-Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, respondent was rightly acquitted of charge under Section 138 of Act. Held, there cannot be any bar to proceed under Section 138 of Act if arb [LexDoc Id : 534169]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
Vinod Enterprises vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Compounding of offence-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, conviction of petitioner under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, parties have settled their dispute amicably inter se them. Entire amou [LexDoc Id : 533860]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
M. Shobha vs M.N. Sareyu
Appeal against acquittal-Sections 138 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption in favour of complainant-Whether, acquittal of respondent for offence under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, from the evidence of PW-1 and the materials placed by her, [LexDoc Id : 533929]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Lochan vs Rajinder Kumar
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Presumption as to negotiable instruments-Whether, conviction of petitioner under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, cheque in question was issued by petitioner in favour of respondent to [LexDoc Id : 533660]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Pawan Dhiman vs Asian Towanvillen Farms Ltd.
Quashing of complaint-Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, acquittal of respondent under section 138 of Act can be quashed. Held, conclusion as drawn by trial Court that issuance of dishonoured negoti [LexDoc Id : 533702]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Anil Kingrani vs Vinod Kumar
Quashing of complaint-Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 139/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, complaint filed under section 139/142 of Act read with Section 420 of IPC can be quashed under section 482 of CrPC. Held, under Section 138 o [LexDoc Id : 533701]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Arvinder Singh Bhatia vs Ashok Kumar Khattar
[LexDoc Id : 533700]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Meenakshi Sain vs Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533411]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
DSC Ltd. vs Dada Jeetu Buildcon (P) Ltd.
Quashing of complaint-Sections 138 & 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Service of notice-Whether, complaint filed under Section 138 of Act can be quashed. Held, proviso to section 138 stipulates three conditions, on satisfaction of which o [LexDoc Id : 533410]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Gulabjeet Singh and Ors. vs Ravel Singh
Power to stop proceedings-Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Quashing of proceedings-Whether the provisions of Section 258 Cr.P.C. for stopping all proceedings are applicable to proceedings initiated under Section 138 of Act. Held, rea [LexDoc Id : 533533]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Surinder Kumar Sharma vs Naresh Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 533532]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Lahnu Ram vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533531]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
A. Mahalingam vs P. Subbaiyan
[LexDoc Id : 532774]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
V.P. Balasubramani vs C. Krishnakumar
Dishonour of cheque-Issuance of Cheque-Whether, Judgment of lower appellate Court holding that accused has probabilised his defence is unsustainable in law, Held, admitted fact that appella [LexDoc Id : 532773]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Kannaiyah Naidu vs R. Vijayakumar
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 138, 139 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Execution of cheque-Whether, acquittal of respondent under section 138 of the Act was justified, Held, power of attorney of complainant had stated that monetary transact [LexDoc Id : 532772]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
P. Govindaraj vs R. Kannan
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumptions as to negotiable instruments-Whether, respondent accused is guilty of offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. Held, to attract penal provisions under Section 138 of Act, cheq [LexDoc Id : 532771]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
R.M. Karuppannan vs S. Sakthi
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption as to negotiable instruments-Whether, acquittal of respondent for offence under section 138 of Act was justified, Held, lower appellate Court has shifted burden on complainant. Sa [LexDoc Id : 533097]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
|
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next | Last |
|