| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 391 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
State of Punjab vs Jagga Singh
[LexDoc Id : 478812]
|
SC |
2014 |
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. vs Enforcement of Directorate
[LexDoc Id : 477810]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Pooja Ravinder Devidasani vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Dishonour of cheques: Putting criminal law into motion for civil disputes impermissible-Superior courts to maintain purity in administration of justice and disallow abuse of court process-Putting the criminal law into motion was not a matter of course. To settle the scores between the parties, which were more in the nature of a civil di [LexDoc Id : 474633]
|
SC |
2014 |
Mahadeo Narayan More and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra
Appeal against setting aside of acquittal: Dying declaration-Doctor certifying recording of dying declaration in his presence, No reason to doubt veracity of dying declaration, Appeal dismissed-In an appeal against setting aside of acquittal of appellants, the Supreme Court noted the testimony of prosecution witness (doctor), who at the begin [LexDoc Id : 474631]
|
SC |
2014 |
State of Punjab vs Labh Singh
[LexDoc Id : 474630]
|
SC |
2014 |
State Tr. Insp. of Police vs A. Arun Kumar and Anr.
Framing of charge against an accused-Principles as regards scope of s.227 and s.228 of CrPC 1973-The trial judge, while considering the question of framing the charges under s.227 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 had the undoubted power to sift [LexDoc Id : 474628]
|
SC |
2014 |
Harish Kumar vs State of Haryana
[LexDoc Id : 474500]
|
SC |
2014 |
S. Dinesh Kumar vs State
[LexDoc Id : 478815]
|
SC |
2014 |
Ajay Kumar Pal vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 478814]
|
SC |
2014 |
Mukesh Kumar vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Award of sentence and conviction under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985-Sentence reduced to the period of sentence already undergone having regard to totality of circumstances-The appellant had been convicted under s.20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imp [LexDoc Id : 474344]
|
SC |
2014 |
Ram Prakash vs State
Appeal against conviction: Prosecution case not proved beyond all reasonable doubt-Appellant given benefit of doubt, Impugned judgment and order on sentence set aside-In an appeal against conviction for the offence under s.20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985, the high court noted [LexDoc Id : 474478]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Rakesh vs State NCT of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 474476]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Khalil Ahmed and Ors. vs State of NCT of Delhi
[LexDoc Id : 474471]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Shlok Bhardwaj vs Runika Bhardwaj and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 474271]
|
SC |
2014 |
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. vs Khuman Singh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 474268]
|
SC |
2014 |
Dnyaneshwar vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 474465]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Uma Shankar Gautam vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Maintaining of conviction notwithstanding acquittal of other accused-Residue of evidence against accused sufficient to prove his guilt-Even if a major portion of the evidence was found to be deficient, in case residue was sufficient to prove guilt of an accused, notwithstanding acquit [LexDoc Id : 474272]
|
SC |
2014 |
Secretary to Government, Public (Law and Order-F) and Anr. vs Nabila and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 474270]
|
SC |
2014 |
Kunwarpal @ Surajpal and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Anr.
Appeal against conviction: Pending litigation culminating into occurrence-Conviction and sentence based on proper appreciation of evidence, Appeal dismissed-The trial court had convicted all the accused for the offence under s.302 read with s.34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 and sentenced them accordingly. [LexDoc Id : 474269]
|
SC |
2014 |
State of Maharashtra vs Ramesh Jijeba Lahane
Ramesh Jijeba Lahane vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 474480]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
State vs Bashir Ahmed Ponnu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 474463]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Shrirang Namdeo Chandanshive and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 474483]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Manish Dosal Barot vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 474473]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2014 |
Raju vs State
[LexDoc Id : 474084]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Mohd. Ahmad Hussain vs State
[LexDoc Id : 474081]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
