| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 118 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
C.V. Berlin vs T.A. George and Ors.
Conviction for dishonour of cheque-Section 138, 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Rebuttal of presumption-Whether, petitioner has been rightly convicted for offence under section 138 of Act. Held, innocuous incongruities in evidence of complainant are not [LexDoc Id : 558376]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Baburajan vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 558372]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Afrojkhan vs Mandodara
Inssuficiency of fund-Conviction-Demand has been set aside by the Commissioner on merits as well as limitation. Whether, demand rightly set aside by Commissioner. Held, respondent did [LexDoc Id : 558375]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2019 |
Kanahaiyalal and Ors. vs Naimuddin
[LexDoc Id : 558373]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2019 |
Afrojkhan vs Mandodara
[LexDoc Id : 557745]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2019 |
Vijuna V.K. vs Mithun K. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 557744]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Divya Dayanand Bhagat vs VPK Urban Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 557743]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2019 |
Haris vs Anoop Sebastian and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 557742]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Sree Lakshmi Kuries and Loans (P) Ltd. vs T.K. Rajan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 557741]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Suman Lakhani vs J.B.B. Marketing (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 557455]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2019 |
V. Surendran vs Sreedevi S. and Ors.
Imposing liability-Sections 143-A and 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. Payment of amount.-Whether, orders impugned under Section 143-A and Section 148 of the Act, Courts below cannot be deemed to have any authority, retrospectively, to pass [LexDoc Id : 558470]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Rameshbhai Kanjibhai Kapuriya vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 558469]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2019 |
Majesh vs Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Conviction-Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1991. Custody certificate.-Petitioner convicted for one year and to pay fine and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month under Sect [LexDoc Id : 558468]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Jagdeep Singh vs Ramesh Singh
Rejection of application-Section 145 (2) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Cross examination of Complainant-Order wherein application under section 145 (2) of Act to examine/cross-examine complainant has been dismissed challenged herein. Whether in terms of [LexDoc Id : 557459]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2019 |
Govindaraju N. vs Venkatesh M.
Acquittal for offence of dishonour of cheque-Sections 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Presumption against issuance of cheque-Whether, respondent accused has been rightly acquitted in proceedings under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, when once accused admitted signatu [LexDoc Id : 557458]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2019 |
Amandeep Kaur and Ors. vs Videocon Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 138, 141, 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Liability of director-Whether, conviction of petitioner accused in Complaint filed under Sections 138/141/142 of Act. Held, petitioner was not Director of Company, when che [LexDoc Id : 557457]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2019 |
Sudharmani and Ors. vs R. Unni Pillai and Ors.
Acquittal for offence of dishonour of cheque-Sections 138, 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Presumption against issuance of cheque-Whether, respondent accused has been rightly acquitted in proceedings under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, scheme of Act does not contemplate [LexDoc Id : 557453]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
D. Ravi vs Pavithran E. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 556948]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Amit Gupta vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Quashing of proceedings-Sections 138, 141 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, proceedings under section 138 read with Section 141 of Act can be quashed. Held, there is no requirement in law that in order to be arraigned [LexDoc Id : 556947]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2019 |
Ashok vs Sunita Sanjay Pawade
[LexDoc Id : 556942]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2019 |
Ghanshyamsinh Umakant Rathod vs Maheshkumar Maganbhai Solanki and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 556945]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2019 |
Kuldeep Mehta vs Mahesh Doordarshan and Ors.
Compounding of offence-Sections 138, 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Petitioner convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. Whether, can in exercise of power under section 147 of Act compound offence. Hel [LexDoc Id : 556944]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2019 |
Rambhool Singh vs Manjeet Singh
Rejection of application-Leave to defend-Whether, leave to defend application of appellant has been rightly rejected. Held, no prudent man would sign blank promissory note or blank documents, [LexDoc Id : 556941]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
K. Bhargavan vs Vijayan and Ors.
Validity of Acquittal-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, accused respondent has been rightly acquitted for offence under Section 138 of Act. Held, initial burden is upon complainant to prove that Ex [LexDoc Id : 556940]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2019 |
Vinod Kumar vs Mukesh Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 560307]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2019 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next | Last |
| |
