Register free! 
Customs - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 269   
Title Forum  Year
Bhavdeep Metals (I) vs CC [LexDoc Id : 222613]
Mumbai HC 2004
Afrique Tradelinks (P) Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 222610]
Gujarat HC 2004
Tin Plate Company of (I) Limited vs State of Bihar [LexDoc Id : 222589]
Jharkhand HC 2004
Arviva Industries (I) Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 222430]
Bombay HC 2004
Adarsh Theatre and Nandan Theatre vs State of Punjab and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 368736]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2004
B. Arun Kumar and Co. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 263775]
HC (Calcutta) 2004
Sony India (P) Ltd. In re; [LexDoc Id : 222133]
AAR 2004
Modest Shipping Agency (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 222132]
Bombay HC 2004
Eastern Tar Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Jharkhand and Others Set-off - Additional sales tax - The set-off could be allowed only on the sales tax paid and not on the additional sales tax under the Jharkhand Industrial Policy 2001. The scheme tha... [LexDoc Id : 232572]
Jharkhand HC 2004
MMT (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs State ok Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 232571]
Karnataka HC 2004
State of Karnataka and Another vs Sangam Solvent Extracts Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 232568]
Karnataka HC 2004
A.P. Moller Singapore (P) Ltd. and Anr vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence [LexDoc Id : 222091]
Bombay HC 2004
Daimler Chrysler India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 222090]
Bombay HC 2004
Globe Enterprises vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 222089]
Bombay HC 2004
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Ltd, Pune and Anr vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 222088]
Bombay HC 2004
K.R. Subbaiah and Anr. vs Indian Bank [LexDoc Id : 400697]
SC 2004
Nap International (P) Ltd. In re; [LexDoc Id : 221814]
Sett. Comm. 2004
Sony (I) (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 221704]
AAR 2004
Unique Creations Ltd. vs State of Karnataka [LexDoc Id : 221666]
Karnataka HC 2004
Shree Sathyanarayana Co. vs AD Writ of mandamum-Retention of documents beyond stipulated time period-A writ of mandamus could not be issued for return of documents seized under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973, merely because the officers had [LexDoc Id : 291527]
HC (Chennai) 2004
Vizar Polymers Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 221559]
Gujarat HC 2004
Sophisticated Marbles and Granite Industries vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 221488]
Bombay HC 2004
Everett (I) (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 221487]
Calcutta HC 2004
Sunshine Enterprises vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 221485]
Chennai HC 2004
Medha Kotwal Lele and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.

Kerala Sthreevedi and Anr. vs State of Kerala and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438178]
SC 2004
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last