Register free! 
Customs - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 2469   
Title Forum  Year
Eureka Forbes Ltd. and Anr. vs Hindustan Unilever Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 336289]
HC (Delhi) 2008
UOI and Ors. vs S. Krishnan and Anr. Post reserved for Scheduled Tribes-Production of bogus certificate-The Supreme Court dismissed the high court’s order that had set aside the respondent’s dismissal order. The high court had concluded that the responde [LexDoc Id : 333531]
SC 2008
B.K. Sri Harsha (Dead) through L.Rs and Anr. vs Bharath Heavy Electricals Ltd. Triable issues-Manner of dismissal or disposal-The Supreme Court held that in case where triable issues were involved, the appeals should not be summarily dismissed or disposed of. [LexDoc Id : 333522]
SC 2008
Palco Metals Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 358810]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2008
Savitriben M. Sanghvi vs Pankaj Champaklal Gandhi [LexDoc Id : 358578]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Suresh Charandas Vaishnv vs Jagdish Kishandas Vaishnv and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 349360]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Swaroop Shipping Services v. CC [LexDoc Id : 341850]
CESTAT 2008
CC and CE vs Lanco Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 341012]
CESTAT 2008
A.R. Marines (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 340634]
CESTAT 2008
CC and CE vs Premier Explosives Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 340207]
CESTAT 2008
CC and CE vs Komma Reddy Computer Services [LexDoc Id : 339001]
CESTAT 2008
CC vs Etco Telecom Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 338092]
CESTAT 2008
Micolube India Ltd. vs Maggon Auto Centre and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 336296]
HC (Delhi) 2008
CCE vs Customs Excise and Gold and Mettur Spinning Mills Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 334400]
HC (Chennai) 2008
CC vs Choice International Customs-Anti-dumping duty-The appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service tax Appellate Tribunal came to be filed against the demand of anti-dumping duty on Compact Fluoresce [LexDoc Id : 334176]
HC (Chennai) 2008
CC and CE vs Phil Corpn. Ltd. Levy of excise duty-Processed and branded dry fruits-Processed and branded cashew nuts, peanuts, almonds etc. were not subject to nil rate of excise duty under Heading 0801.00 of the Central Excise Tarif [LexDoc Id : 333552]
SC 2008
Swaika Properties (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. Acquisition of Land-Maintainability of writ petition, Delay and laches-The Supreme Court held that a writ petition challenging Notification dated 08 February 1984 for acquisition of land, if filed after the possession hav [LexDoc Id : 333344]
SC 2008
Sushila Industries vs CST [LexDoc Id : 375614]
HC (Allahabad) 2008
Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Shankar Enterprises [LexDoc Id : 352456]
HC (Allahabad) 2008
Amrit Ranjan Goswami vs Assam Financial Corporation and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 346063]
HC (Gauhati) 2008
Dewan Steel Industries vs CC [LexDoc Id : 343730]
CESTAT 2008
Aman Alloys Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 341233]
CESTAT 2008
Mary Rama Rao @ Darala Mary vs State of Goa and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 340820]
HC (Bombay) 2008
CC and CE vs Dhanesh Textile Industries (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 340631]
CESTAT 2008
Baban Kundlik Karale vs Mahendra Yelnath Karale and Yelnath Gaibi Karale [LexDoc Id : 340441]
HC (Bombay) 2008
 
First | Prev | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | Next | Last