| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2517 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Rashid and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 376224]
|
SC |
2009 |
Mithilesh Chauhan vs Rajesh Kumar Pandey
[LexDoc Id : 375865]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Dashrath Rao Kate vs Brij Mohan Srivastava
[LexDoc Id : 375469]
|
SC |
2009 |
Superintendent of Customs vs Jacab Bava Padhiar
Acquittal by trial court: Scope of interference by appellate court-Appellate court not required to re-write the judgment or to give fresh reasoning when reasons assigned by court below found just and proper-It was settled principle that while exercising appellate power, even if two reasonable conclusions were possible on the basis of the evidence on recor [LexDoc Id : 420971]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Urban Improvement Trust vs Mohan Lal
[LexDoc Id : 399714]
|
SC |
2009 |
Gautam Sengupta vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 389853]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
M. Punitha vs Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 389799]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Om Suchi Shipping and Logistics (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388640]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Midex Global (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 386776]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Crystal Glazes vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 383213]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Konaseema EPS Oakwell Power Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 382352]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd. and Y. Harichandra Prasad vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 381944]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
We Help vs ACCE and Service Tax
Non-representation despite grant of 14 adjournments-Petitioner directed to appear before appellate tribunal-The high court noted that the CESTAT by its order dismissed the petitioner’s appeal, as the petitioner, despite grant of 14 adjournments, did not care [LexDoc Id : 376421]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2009 |
UOI vs Entrack International Trading (P) Ltd.
Confiscation of goods-Goods manufactured out of animal leather-The Revenue department had erred in confiscating the goods (watch straps) of the respondent under the pretext that they had been made out of leather o [LexDoc Id : 375936]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Atlas Interactive India (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Re-export: Release of goods-Goods sought to be re-exported, Drawback claimed as contract terminated-The petitioner had entered into a franchisee agreement with BSNL whereby it was to provide broadband connection to landline subscribers of BSNL in cer [LexDoc Id : 375895]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Rakesh Bala Aneja and Ors. vs J.S. Sood and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375508]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Sushil Choudhery vs Neeraj Basoya
[LexDoc Id : 375364]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Celina Coelho Pereira and Ors. vs Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 375344]
|
SC |
2009 |
Bhavin Impex (P) Ltd. vs State of Gujarat
Interpretation of statutes-Construction in effect obliterating it from statute book to be eschewed-While interpreting a statutory provision, a construction, which would in effect obliterate it from the statute book, should be eschewed. [LexDoc Id : 401199]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Uniworth Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 388982]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Hermes Forwarders vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 386313]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
P. Ramesh vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 383534]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
CCE vs Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 383382]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Ravi S. Kotian, Sanjay B. Nair, Vivek Dutta and Arvind Saxena vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 376981]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CTT vs Adhunik Krishi Yantra Udyog
[LexDoc Id : 375581]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
