| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2943 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sanjay Agarwal vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 396021]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2010 |
Antonio Ferdino Varela vs Theresa Maria Angela Varela
Rupa Mangaldas Mandrekar Alias Balkrishna Narvekar vs Mangaldas Vishnu Mandrekar
Mohanlal Putu Raikar vs Chanda Chandrakant Kittur
[LexDoc Id : 395133]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Fernandes Realtors (P) Ltd. and Anselmo D'Souza vs Goan Wonderland, Eric Sequeira, Gautam Patel and Mala Gautam Patel
[LexDoc Id : 394928]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Sanjeeta Das vs Tapan Kumar Mohanty
[LexDoc Id : 394921]
|
SC |
2010 |
Mumbai International Airport (P) Ltd. vs Golden Chariot Airport and Anr.
Airport Authority of India vs Golden Chariot Airport and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394919]
|
SC |
2010 |
Sadanand Bhimrao Narnawre vs Reserve Bank of India
[LexDoc Id : 440521]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Velocity Ltd. vs State Bank of India
[LexDoc Id : 419539]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2010 |
Mihir Pal vs United Commercial Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 412818]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Ashwin Chimanlal Sheth and 2 Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 406326]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
ACD Communication (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 403263]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
P.R. Mathaiyan vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 403079]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
L.M.L. Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401627]
|
SC |
2010 |
Jaipur Development Authority vs Mahesh Sharma and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 400970]
|
SC |
2010 |
Dhar Textile Mills Ltd. vs Canara Bank and Ors. (No. 2)
[LexDoc Id : 399469]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2010 |
CC vs Little Flower Hospital
[LexDoc Id : 399032]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
NRC Ltd. vs UOI
Binding effect of CBEC Circular-Taking of contrary stand by department not permissible, Not open to revenue to advance argument or file appeal contrary to circular-Although a circular was not binding on a court or an assessee, it was not open to the revenue to raise the contention that was contrary to a binding c [LexDoc Id : 398143]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Geldhof Auto and Gas Industries Ltd. vs UOI
Interpretation of statues: Words ‘and’ and ‘or’-Interchanging of words not allowable if meaning of statue clear-The word ‘or’ and the word ‘and’ were often used interchangeably. The court, through construction, might change one to the other. However, this could [LexDoc Id : 398140]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
L.M.L. Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 395263]
|
SC |
2010 |
Raghunath Parbati Chavan vs Tarabai Shakar Chavan (Dead) through L.Rs, Shantabai Gulabrao Shinde, Pradeed Gulabrao Shinde, Bhausaheb Gulabrao Shinde, Prakash Tukaram Chavan, Vilas Tukaram Chavan, Namdev Shankar Jadhav and Vishnu Shankar Jadhav
[LexDoc Id : 395141]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Surya Pharmeuticals Ltd. vs Brahmanand
[LexDoc Id : 394949]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Sukhdev Singh vs Bakha Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394947]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Ashok Kumar vs Kashmir Singh
[LexDoc Id : 394942]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Ritesh Tewari and Anr. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394821]
|
SC |
2010 |
Satnam Singh @ Satta vs ACC
Person ‘accused of any offence’: Availability of benefit of guarantee against testimonial compulsion-Accusation levelled only when complaint filed-In order to claim the benefit of the guarantee, against testimonial compulsion, embodied in article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, it should be s [LexDoc Id : 424660]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Victor Robinson vs State Information Commission
Failure of statutory authorities in deciding application seeking information-Authorities required to ensure that appropriate action taken with expediency-The petitioner had made an application seeking information in terms of s.7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. On failure of statutory authorities i [LexDoc Id : 411279]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
