| First | Prev | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2660 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Goldie Sud vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Invitation of bids for sale of property by auction: Property not saleable below reserve price-Bids received in excess of reserve price, Highest bid confirmed, Petition challenging sale dismissed-The first respondent-bank had invited bids for a public auction of an immovable property. The notice inviting the tenders specifically stipulated that [LexDoc Id : 401746]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Hanjabi Ratanchand Solanki, Gitamal @ Otarmal Ratanchand Solanki, Bastimal Ratanchand Solanki, Jethmal @ Sheshmal Ratanchand Solanki and Ors. vs Hansraj Mishrimal Jain (Dead) through L.Rs, Kanugabai Hansraj Jain, Ashok Hansraj Jain Ranka and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 401454]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. vs Madhav Prasad Sharma
[LexDoc Id : 401410]
|
SC |
2011 |
Sanatan Dharam Sabha vs Chander Bhan (Dead) through L.Rs
[LexDoc Id : 401383]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Merwyn Anthony Fernandes vs Brian Louis Sequeira and Jane Philomena Sequeira
[LexDoc Id : 401309]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Ashok Kumar Chadha vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 441957]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 419655]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Indofill Organic Industries Ltd. vs Amar Vakil and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 412771]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Maize Products vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 409586]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Bharti Bhutada vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 408124]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Shunk Corrugators (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Bharat Co-op Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 401461]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
GGSIP University vs Dhruv Singhal, Shrishti Chandok and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 401258]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
State of Kerala and Ors. vs M.G. Presanna
Condonation of delay: Delay in filing review petition condoned by single judge-Rejection of writ appeal by Division Bench, Delay satisfactorily explained, Division Bench not bound to accept the period in respect of which delay condoned, Impugned order set aside-The single judge had allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent. The appellants filed a review petition after a delay of 305 days. The single jud [LexDoc Id : 401244]
|
SC |
2011 |
Shanti Devi vs State of Haryana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 401223]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Raminder Chimni and Anr. vs Nirmla and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 401218]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Karaj Singh vs Malkiat Singh
[LexDoc Id : 401212]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
State of Punjab and Anr. vs Hai Om Narang
[LexDoc Id : 401209]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Uttam Sucrotech International (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Condonation of delay: Limitation-Appeal presented on 91st day not condoned-The revenue had contended that the petitioner’s appeal was on 91st day and, therefore, could not be condoned. The petitioner submitted that the initia [LexDoc Id : 401156]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Anand Auto Craft Centre, Chakradar Auto Udyog (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Engg. Export Promotion Council
Refusal to clear claims for payment in terms of IPR Scheme: Necessity of complete documentation to clear claims-No estoppel against respondent in respect of its letter to DGFT seeking clarification on whether amounts could be released to claimants-Refusal by the respondent to clear the petitioners’ claims for payment in terms of International Price Reimbursement Scheme could not be said to be ei [LexDoc Id : 401151]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Glorio Rosario Furtado (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. vs Cathedral Chapter of the Archidiocese of Goa and Daman, Santana Fernandes, Alexandre Fernandes (Dead) through L.Rs, Ramesh Sirvoicar, Jose Martinho Fernandes (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 401138]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Ashwini Kavlekar vs State of Goa and Mira Shamba Kavlekar
[LexDoc Id : 401135]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Gram Panchayat vs State Information Commission and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 401134]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Radha Singh, Santokh Singh, Dalip Singh, Sarain Singh and Balkar Singh vs Assistant Collector
[LexDoc Id : 401133]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Yadu Sambhaji More and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 401084]
|
SC |
2011 |
Automotive Tyre Manufacturers Association vs DA and Ors.
Burden of anti dumping duty-Refund of duty not claimable-In the case of indirect taxes like central excise duties and customs duties, the tax collected by the State without the authority of law, would not be [LexDoc Id : 401078]
|
SC |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | Next | Last |
| |
