| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2660 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Vuppalamritha Magnetic Components Ltd. and Prithvi Information System Ltd. vs DA and Ministry of Finance
[LexDoc Id : 419876]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Elgitread India Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 419415]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Allied Enterprises, Technova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., DSM Nutritional Product Ltd. and Ors. vs DA/MOF
Bhagiradha Chemicals and Industries Ltd. and Siris Crop Science Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 418961]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Slotco Steel Products (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Anr.
Compounding of offences: Challenge to provision stipulating payment of duty, penalty or interest for hearing or allowing compounding application-Condition precedent not onerous, Conditions treated rigorous lying in different realm, Provision not ultra vires the Central Excise Act 1944-The second proviso to rule 4(3) of the Central Excise (Compounding of Offences) Rules 2005 stipulated that unless duty, penalty or interest were paid, [LexDoc Id : 416900]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Adiwasi Seva Sahakari Sanstha vs Gondia District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 415898]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Shashibir Singh Sarang vs Kanwal Sunir Singh Sarang and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 415350]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CC vs Vikas Corpn.
[LexDoc Id : 443003]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Rungta Irrigation Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 433474]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Mini Max Overseas vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 422859]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Aman Cargo (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417412]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Ramgopal Baliram Soni
[LexDoc Id : 415974]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Sanjeev Kumar Jain vs Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust
[LexDoc Id : 415347]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Agarwal Oil Refinery Corpn. vs CTT
CTT vs Agarwal Oil Refinery Corpn.
U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948: Levy of tax on burnt mobil oil by treating it as old discarded unserviceable store-Dismissal of revision by relying on previous judgment, Substantial factual difference between instant case and the case on which reliance placed, Matter remanded-The appellant-dealer had purchased burnt mobil oil and refined the same. The assessing authority levied tax on the oil under s.3-AAAA of the U.P. Trad [LexDoc Id : 414724]
|
SC |
2011 |
Environmental and Consumer Protection Foundation vs Delhi Administration and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437456]
|
SC |
2011 |
CC vs SNS Overseas (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 424672]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CC vs Kamal Bajaj
[LexDoc Id : 418875]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CC vs Anmol Marketing
[LexDoc Id : 418603]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Ethiopian Airlines vs Ganesh Narain Saboo
[LexDoc Id : 415711]
|
SC |
2011 |
Jaitunabi Shekh Musa vs Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Collector and Taj Kha Bhikan Kha
[LexDoc Id : 415529]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Nehru Place Hotels Ltd. vs Bhushan Ltd. & Bhushan Steel and Strips Ltd.
Winding up proceedings: Jurisdiction of company court-Company court not bound by decree while examining existence of debt, Winding up jurisdiction discretionary, Civil rights between debtor and creditor not adjudicated-The company court, in the course of the winding up proceedings, was not bound by a decree of the court when it had to determine as to whether there ex [LexDoc Id : 414797]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Deepak Khosla vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414788]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
K.T. Plantation (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 414640]
|
SC |
2011 |
Primex Sales vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 423542]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
UOI vs Champabai Devichand Saha (D)
Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1976: Writ petitions challenging forfeiture proceedings allowed-Validity of notices and forfeiture orders with reference to Act not considered, Principles relating to Act laid down by Supreme Court not considered, Impugned order unsustainable, Matter remitted-The high court, in terms of an earlier order, had allowed the writ petitions challenging the forfeiture proceedings. On appeals by special leave, the [LexDoc Id : 420952]
|
SC |
2011 |
Vinay Auto Copier Machine, Shivendra Enterprises, Kiran Office Solutions, Pragya Impex, Lav Auto Copier Machine, City Office Equipment and Anand Impex vs UOI and CC
Environmental measures by State Government and statutory authorities: Anticipation, prevention and attacking of causes of environmental degradation-Lack of scientific certainty no reason for postponing prevention of environmental degradation in case of threats of serious and irreversible damage, Onus to prove action environmentally benign on actor or developer or industrialist-Environmental measures by the State Government and the statutory authorities should anticipate, prevent and attack the causes of environmental degrada [LexDoc Id : 416852]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
