| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2660 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kingtech Electronics India (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428272]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Rose Zinc Ltd. vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 425299]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2011 |
Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. vs UOI
Maintainability of writ petition: Averments in petition to be read as they were-Merits of averments not to be gone into for deciding issue-For deciding this issue of maintainability of the writ petition, the averments made in the writ petition had to be read as they were and their merits [LexDoc Id : 421572]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr. vs Ganpati Cargo Movers
[LexDoc Id : 421040]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Veet Rag Homes (P) Ltd. vs UOI, State of Maharashtra and Akash Universal (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 420940]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Citi Bank N.A. vs Rakesh Kumar and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 420840]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Shree Ambica Developers vs State of Maharashtra, Tanaji V. Satre and CIDCO Maharashtra Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 420831]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Heriberto Francisco Maria D'Cunha alias Heriberto D'Cunha (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. vs Victor Luis Monteiro, Francisco Alberto Lourenco D'Cunha, Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Ltd., Ida Berta dos Remedios Cunha e Gomes, William Gomes, Zaria Dias Gomes
[LexDoc Id : 420937]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Leotex vs UOI (No. 2)
Appeal to high court: Relegation to avail statutory remedy by way of appeal-Direction to consider claim under rule 12, Claim rejected, Petitioner entitled to challenge rejection order by way of further appeal, No need or necessity to invoke discretionary jurisdiction under article 226, Appeal dismissed-The single judge had observed that there was no positive direction declaring the rights and liberties of the petitioner to have the benefit of the sch [LexDoc Id : 430480]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
New Bridge Holdings BV vs TTK-LIG Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 429957]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Allied Motors Ltd. vs Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 427420]
|
SC |
2011 |
Zubairullah Sheriff and Zakirullah Sheriff vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 426849]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CC vs S. Gunasekaran
[LexDoc Id : 426015]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
GRIDCO Ltd. and Anr. vs Sadananda Doloi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420867]
|
SC |
2011 |
Delhi Music Society vs Director General of Income Tax
Exemption- Educational institution –Music & Dance School-Relevant considerations-The assessee society was promoting and teaching all forms of music & dance. It was being run like a school with regular classes. It did not conduct it [LexDoc Id : 420843]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Agrasen Co-op Group Housing Society Ltd. vs Delhi Development Authority
[LexDoc Id : 420842]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Guy Vigney Athanasius D'Melo and Maria Esmeralda Veronica de Mello vs Government of Goa, Commissioner of Excise Government of Goa, Alvaro Ferrao, Alvaro Ferrao and UOI
[LexDoc Id : 420829]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
P. Mahalingam vs Monica Kumar and Anr.
Monica Kumar and Anr. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420762]
|
SC |
2011 |
Shri Morvi Sarvajanik Kelavni Mandal Sanchalit MSKM B.Ed. College vs National Council for Teachers' Education and Ors.
Shri Yogananda Education and Charitable Trust vs National Council for Teachers' Education and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420761]
|
SC |
2011 |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. (No. 3) vs UOI
Refund claim: Mistaken payment of excise duty: Rejection of refund claim on ground of failure to establish compliance with requirements of relevant Rules and exemption Notification-Remand of matter to revisional authority for re-examination, Claim not to be defeated on ground of some procedural infraction or non-supply of documents if mandatory and substantive requirement of Rules and Notification was fulfilled-The petitioner had supplied aviation fuel to Air India. For the foreign bound flights such fuel did not attract excise duty. The petitioner had, howev [LexDoc Id : 435604]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Salma Shakil vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 434162]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. (No. 2) vs UOI
Refund claim: Excise duty though exempt paid wrongly-Question of fact requiring examination of bulky materials, Matter remitted-The petitioner had claimed that duty paid aviation fuel supplied to foreign bound flights was exempt from payment of excise duty as per exemption noti [LexDoc Id : 429075]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
SRK Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 429028]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CC vs Samarth Industries
Commencement of anti-dumping duty: Duty leviable from date from which provisional duty was imposed-Final duty on imposition relating back to imposition of provisional duty and not retrospective in nature or character-The high court, on the question whether the levy of a final anti-dumping duty would cover the entire period from the date of the issuance of provision [LexDoc Id : 427425]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Unitech International Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 422526]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
