| First | Prev | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1890 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Nirma Ltd. vs Saint Gobain Glass India Ltd.
Interpretation of statutes-Basic principle of literal rule of interpretation to be followed-While interpreting a statute the basic principle of literal rule of interpretation had to be followed. If the language of statute did not admit of the [LexDoc Id : 430585]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Shaikh Abdul Rahim Nabi vs Anjuman-I-Islam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428999]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Rosalina Coutinho e Quadros (Dead) through L.Rs vs Remigio Quadros (Dead) through L.Rs and Antonieta Quadros
[LexDoc Id : 428976]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Pramod @ Badukaka Purushottam Bacchav vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428835]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Jeevan Kapurchand Bafana, hika Pandurang Kotkar and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428038]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Sunil Kohli and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 427419]
|
SC |
2012 |
P.A. Mohammed Riyas vs M.K. Raghavan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 426341]
|
SC |
2012 |
Avishek Goenka vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 426332]
|
SC |
2012 |
U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. vs Rajesh Kumar and Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh vs Brij Bhushan Sharma and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 426260]
|
SC |
2012 |
Swapan Kumar Pusilal vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 444550]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Trade Wings Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 442936]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Commissioner, Commercial Tax vs Panch Kanya Road Carriers
[LexDoc Id : 440945]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2012 |
First Track Traders vs CC
Permissibility of import on satisfaction of certain conditions-Violation of such conditions making the goods imported as prohibited goods within the meaning of s.2(33)-When import was permissible on satisfaction of certain conditions, the violation of such conditions would make the goods imported as prohibited goods [LexDoc Id : 438444]
|
HC (Madras) |
2012 |
Mahindra and Mahindra, In re
[LexDoc Id : 437561]
|
GOI |
2012 |
Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd., Nandan Vithal Yalgi, Fedrick D'souza, J.M. Baxi and Co B.N. Malli Austin S. Fernandes A.R.B. D'souza and D.V. Daivajna vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 433464]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
Kitex Garments Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 430633]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2012 |
X vs Director General, DGCEI and Ors.
Petition for release of reward: Reward purely ex-gratia and no vested right to payment of reward-Sole discretion of competent authority to release reward, Issue as regards culpability of petitioner pending in appeal before tribunal, Petition dismissed with direction to tribunal to expeditiously dispose appeal-By a writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction to the respondents to release a reward, which he claimed to be due to him under a scheme of the [LexDoc Id : 427046]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
CC vs Noshire Moody
Exemption claim: Import of vehicle-Car trans-shipped from manufacturer in Italy to Ferrari dealer in UK, Registration of the car in UK only to comply with requirement of licensing authorities, Finding that vehicle was new not perverse or contrary to evidence-The respondent had imported a Ferrari and claimed the benefit of Customs Notification No. 21 dated 01 March 2002 on the basis that it was a brand new [LexDoc Id : 426958]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Gita Biswas vs UOI and ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442228]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Promech Industries vs Assistant Commissioner
[LexDoc Id : 438527]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Technical Stampings Automotive Ltd. @ JBM Sungwoo Ltd. vs DCTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 434487]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Nilam P. Putta vs Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 428795]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Nitesh Kumar Kedia, Gopal Dokania, Arun Dokania, Sanjeev Jain, Anudeep Singh, Anup Singh and Mahender Jain vs CC
Order of tribunal: Only one paragraph specifically dealing with and referring to allegations and recording findings of tribunal-Statements of appellants not referred and/or specifically examined, Order virtually a non-speaking order and not meeting requirements of law, Matter remitted-The high court, on the question whether the impugned order of tribunal in the case of appellants met and dealt with the contentions raised by the part [LexDoc Id : 426469]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. vs Torhi Singh
[LexDoc Id : 442223]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
New Indore Delhi Road Lines vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 437940]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2012 |
| |
| First | Prev | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | Next | Last |
| |
