First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 1890 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sayyed M. Masud vs UOI and Anr.
Stay of arrest on presumption that arrest relating to offences under Customs Act 1962-Investigations against petitioner under the provisions of FEMA 1999 and PMLA 2002, Interim order vacated-The Supreme Court had stayed the arrest of petitioner presuming that the same would be relating to the offences under the Customs Act 1962. However, i [LexDoc Id : 434476]
|
SC |
2012 |
Meet Traders vs State of Gujarat and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 449228]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
Santosh Maruti Walanj vs Manoj Sadashiv Jadhav
[LexDoc Id : 446226]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Mangalam Group, Shekhar Infratech, Keshav Girijprasad Goyal and Parvindar Gurudayalsing Randhava vs Shivsambha Gokul Gosavi, Ganesh Gokul Gosavi, Laxmi Gokul Gosavi, Madhukar Babugir Gosavi, Pimpri Chinchwad New Township Development Authority
[LexDoc Id : 446208]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
CC vs Ashok Kumar Jain and Anr.
Application for settlement of cases: Provisions relating to confiscation general in nature and applicable to all classes of imports-No bar under s.127(A) and s.127(B) to entertain applications by passengers bringing goods through their baggage, Provisions conferring jurisdiction on settlement commission not construable narrowly-Upon receiving the show cause notice in respect of three wrist watches for which different customs duty, penalty and confiscation was proposed, the re [LexDoc Id : 445555]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. and Ors. vs Employees' State Insurance Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 442777]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2012 |
Ratan Biswas vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 441756]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2012 |
Iliyas Hanif Qureshi vs Tembi Muslim Jamat Masjid Trust and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 440604]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Gurcharan Singh vs Surjit Singh and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 433601]
|
SC |
2012 |
Vebhav Synthetics (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 450623]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Akabari Kaushik Hansrajbhai and Ors. vs State of Gujarat and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 444547]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2012 |
V. Pitchiyya vs CBEC
Qualification in CHA oral and written examination held under old regulations: Old regulations existing prior to the coming into force of new regulations-Direction to respondents to issue necessary certificate granting licence to petitioner on the petitioner complying with prescribed requirements-The petitioner had qualified in the customs house agent written and oral examination held under regulation 9 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Reg [LexDoc Id : 443317]
|
HC (Madras) |
2012 |
Assistant General Manager vs Presiding Officer and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442550]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2012 |
Julie Jayesh Shah vs Jayesh Trilok Kumar Shah
[LexDoc Id : 440613]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
J. Mitra and Bros. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 438580]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
DBOI Global Service (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Maintainability of writ petition against order-in-original passed by AO-Petition maintainable when reasons for disagreeing with decision of earlier AO not recorded and to prevent miscarriage of justice-Ordinarily writ petition was not entertained against an order-in-original passed by the AO. However, if the AO failed to record the reasons for disagr [LexDoc Id : 437948]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
National Steel and Agro Industries Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 434957]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra vs State of Maharashtra, Dinkar Pinigle and Ranjeet Andhale and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 458661]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
A. Saleh Mohamed and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 458074]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Balaji Silk House and Ors. and Varalakshmi Silk House vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 453444]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2012 |
V.P. Rasheed vs GOI
Conversion formula clarified by CBEC: Clarification strictly applicable to round timber logs imported and sold as such-Petitioner not entitled to mix and interchange conversion factor of round timber logs with that of sawnwood, Petition dismissed-The high court, taking note of difference in the conversion formula had directed the CBEC to clarify the same. Consequent to this direction, a clarifi [LexDoc Id : 451128]
|
HC (Madras) |
2012 |
A Saleh Mohamed and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 434054]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
CC vs Sujag Fine Chemicals India Ltd.
Interpretation of fiscal statutes-Exemption notification to be strictly construed-It was well-settled principle of interpretation of fiscal status that exemption notification had to be strictly read and it was not permissible to eit [LexDoc Id : 433792]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Geetanjali Woollens (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 442941]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
Inderpal Singh Gujral vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 440805]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2012 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|