Register free! 
Customs - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 716   
Title Forum  Year
CC and CE and Anr. vs Aban Exim (P) Ltd. Import of goods without valid BIS certificate: Discretion of adjudication officer-Proceedings restored-The assessee had imported goods without a valid certificate from Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) under Pneumatic Tyres and Tubes for Automotive Vehic [LexDoc Id : 467208]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
Vishal Beverages (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr. Duty Drawback – Relaxation of Time Limit-Party-seeking relief must come to Court with clean hands.-Indirect Tax – Petitioner claimed duty drawback on ground that it suffered double tax as he paid duty not only at time of import but also to complied [LexDoc Id : 465729]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Travelite India vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465728]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Group Captain Nitin Kanitkar vs Meenu Nitin Kanitkar [LexDoc Id : 465705]
HC (Bombay) 2014
Girish Satyanarayan Shukla vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465703]
HC (Bombay) 2014
Exide Industries Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. Indirect Taxation – Levy of Sales Tax – Exemption -Word ‘sale’ appearing in S. 5(3) of CST cannot be construed to mean an ‘agreement to sell’, said word refers to completed sale as defined in S. 2(g) of CST. -Petitioner agreed to sell Submarine Navy Batteries to M/s Crown which subsequently exported to Algerian Navy – Section 5 of Central Sales Tax Act, 195 [LexDoc Id : 465702]
HC (Bombay) 2014
E.I. DuPont India (P) Ltd. vs UOI Indirect Tax – Custom – Extra Duty Deposit -In case provisional assessment is resorted, investigation and finalization of assessment must be completed within four months from date of reply and if not completed within said period, extra duty deposit will be discontinued.-Petitioner challenged action of Respondents in loading 1% Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) on imports – Rule 2(2) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value [LexDoc Id : 465701]
HC (Bombay) 2014
U.C. Raman vs P.T.A. Rahim and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 472891]
SC 2014
Ram Daan (Dead) through L.Rs vs Urban Improvement Trust [LexDoc Id : 472887]
SC 2014
Amit Electronics vs CC [LexDoc Id : 471877]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Gopal Saha and Gopinath Chaurasia vs CC Customs-Confiscation of goods of foreign origin. Persuasive Value of trade opinion -Betel nuts allegedly of foreign origin were confiscated and penalty was imposed on appellants. Whether, order of confiscation and imposition of penalt [LexDoc Id : 471727]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2014
Lasiben Kalabhai Jhala and Ors. vs Babubhai Chhaganbhaimistry and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 467826]
HC (Gujarat) 2014
Gupta Suppliers Company Thru Sole Proprietor vs Commercial Tax Tribunal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 467748]
HC (Allahabad) 2014
V.R.A. Cotton Mills (P). Ltd. vs CC Customs – Amendment of Shipping Bill – Time Limit-Para 4.28(e) of HBP Vol-I 2009-14, Rule 12 of Rules and Section 149 of Act, 1962 not specifically provided any time limit of 3 months for applying for conversion of Shipping Bill.-Indirect Taxation – Appellant challenged order of ld. commissioner of rejecting his request for conversion of Shipping Bill from Duty Free Import Auth [LexDoc Id : 466301]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2014
Board of Technical Education vs Sahibjeet Singh [LexDoc Id : 465721]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Khushbu Sandeep Jain and Anjana Rikabchand Mehta vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465708]
HC (Bombay) 2014
Anita vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465694]
HC (Delhi) 2014
Archer Metal Ltd. and 1 vs. UOI and 4 [LexDoc Id : 471088]
HC (Gujarat) 2014
State of Gujarat Through CCT vs Dhorajia Construction Co. [LexDoc Id : 468709]
HC (Gujarat) 2014
Sanjay Gupta and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 465577]
SC 2014
DSJ Communications vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 471876]
HC (Delhi) 2014
K.C. Das Diamond and Jewellers and Anr. vs Jewal India and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 465600]
HC (Calcutta) 2014
Standard Chartered Bank vs India Glycols Ltd. Jurisdiction – Concurrent Jurisdiction-Requirement of concurrent Jurisdiction-Civil - Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Whether the High Court's original civil jurisdiction and the DRT can be considered courts of "c [LexDoc Id : 465497]
HC (Delhi) 2014
CC vs CESTAT and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 474273]
HC (Madras) 2014
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 471663]
HC (Gujarat) 2014
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last