First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 191 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
S.N. Ojha vs CC
Imposition of penalty: Consignments permitted to be exported without examination-Statements of customs officers clearly implicating the appellant, Appeal dismissed-Whether the order affirming the imposition of penalty of Rs.3 lakhs on the appellant under section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 was justified. He [LexDoc Id : 490841]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
S.N. Ojha vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 490496]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Samsung India Electronics (P) Ltd. State of Punjab and ors.
[LexDoc Id : 492703]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Him Logistics (P) Ltd. vs CC
Revocation of CHA licence and forfeiture of security: Inquiry report in favour of petitioner-Reasons for disagreement not communicated prior to taking adverse decision, Impugned order quashed-Whether the order revoking the customs house agent licence of the petitioner and ordering forfeiture of the security furnished by the petitioner and f [LexDoc Id : 489997]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Nokia India (P) Ltd. vs ACCT and Ors.
Demand for differential tax on sale of chargers with cellular phones along with interest and penalty-Interim protection granted against recovery of penalty to similarly placed manufacturers, Impugned orders modified-Whether the demand for differential tax on sale of chargers with the cellular phones along with interest thereon as also penalty was sustainable. Held [LexDoc Id : 492734]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2015 |
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association and Anr. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 489713]
|
SC |
2015 |
Continental Carbon India Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Detention of goods: No orders passed on application for provisional assessment or for storage of goods in a warehouse-Demurrage charges on detained goods not chargeable till the date of final clearance-Whether the customs department had seized or detained or confiscated the imported goods, which had landed in the customs area. Held, there was always [LexDoc Id : 490089]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
Association of Agro Importers and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 489673]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
State of Gujarat vs Deepak Petroleum Ltd.
Reduction of amount of pre-deposit: Tribunal's prima facie view in favour of the assessee-Financial hardship not contemplated by section 73(3) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003, Appeal dismissed-Whether the tribunal was justified in reducing the amount of pre-deposit as directed by the first appellate authority as a condition precedent for hea [LexDoc Id : 492736]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Bharmpal Panchal and Anr. vs UOI
Rejection of settlement applications: Omission of section 28AB when applications filed-Interest, penalty or fine payable only on existence of substantive provision in the Act for payment of the same-Whether rejection of balance settlement applications arising out of show cause notices was justified. Held, on the date when these applications were f [LexDoc Id : 489589]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
CC vs JSW Steel Ltd.
Eligibility for clearance of imported goods under Status Holder Incentive Scheme-Entire capital goods imported installed and commissioned in respective projects, Benefit of Notification available-Whether the respondents were eligible for clearance of imported goods under the Status Holder Incentive (SHIS) Scheme as per Customs Notification No. [LexDoc Id : 489518]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
ITC Ltd. vs CCE
Misdeclaration of goods: Availment of concessional rate of duty-Mandatory condition of Customs Notification No. 21 dated 01 March 2002 not complied with, Impugned order upheld-Whether the order rejecting the transaction value of waste paper, valuing the non-declared items by fixing the transaction value of plastic scrap meta [LexDoc Id : 489519]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
O.P. Suri and Parveen Kumar vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 489516]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Suchi Fasteners (P) Ltd. vs CCE, C
[LexDoc Id : 489514]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
Jagriti Plastics Ltd. and Ors. vs Commissioner of Trade and Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 507810]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Lark Laboratories India Ltd. vs Commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.
Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004: Limitation on assessment and re-assessment-Effect of substitution of section 34(1)(a), Impugned notices issued beyond limitation period quashed-Whether the notices of default assessment of tax and interest and of assessment of penalty all dated 01 April 2015 were barred by limitation having be [LexDoc Id : 489379]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
PSL Ltd. vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 489291]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2015 |
Kamal D. Mundra vs CCE, Customs and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 489300]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2015 |
Martwin Electronics, Chandrakant K. Zangda and Rachana Electronics vs CCE and Service Tax
Appeals against order-in-original: Huge undervaluation proved by revenue-Failure of appellants to discharge their burden of proof, Appeals rejected-Whether the order-in-original confirming the demand of duty on the appellants along with interest, holding the impugned goods liable for confiscation [LexDoc Id : 489296]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2015 |
Mishra and Mishra Agency Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 489295]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 489224]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2015 |
CC vs G.M. Exports and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 488759]
|
SC |
2015 |
Devi Marine Food Exports Ltd. and Devi Sea Foods Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 489209]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
Gurdeep Kaur vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 488650]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Pandi Devi Oil Industry and CC vs CC and Pandi Devi Oil Industry
[LexDoc Id : 488613]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2015 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last |
|