First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 275 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
DHL Express India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 500583]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
K.V. Ismail vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 500035]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
L. Harish Gandhi vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 500036]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Bunge India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 499976]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Hoang Anh Shipping JSC and Ors. vs Cargo of Sand and Ors.
Refusal to bear costs of discharge of cargo: No absolute or general rule that only ship interests should bear costs and expenses-Innocent third party suffering prejudice by reason of plaintiff's action in arresting property, Notice of motion allowed-Whether the plaintiff, who had secured an order of arrest over cargo laden on board the ship but had neither sought nor obtained any order for arrest [LexDoc Id : 499624]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2016 |
Bhaskar Logistic Services (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Suspension of CHA license: Failure to exercise due diligence to ascertain correctness of information imparted-Findings of fact normally not gone into in a proceeding under article 226, Applications dismissed-Whether suspension of petitioner's customs house agent license was justified. Held, there had been no violation of principles of natural justice. The [LexDoc Id : 499623]
|
HC (Patna) |
2016 |
UOI and Ors. vs Seahorse Hospitals Ltd.
Enforcement of liability after rescission of notification-Cancellation of duty exemption certificates on ground of non-compliance of conditions for subsequent period not justified-Whether the authorities could enforce the liability after rescission of Customs Notification No. 64 dated 01 March 1988. Held, the respondent, which h [LexDoc Id : 499628]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Horizon Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Provisional release of seized cigarettes: Goods admittedly imported by concealment-Impugned goods not expressly prohibited for importation, Petitioner entitled for option to redeem-Whether seized cigarettes imported under each of the three consignments could be provisionally released. Held, cigarettes and restricted R-22 gas were [LexDoc Id : 499625]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Shah Infra Towers (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 500038]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
A.S. Enterprises vs CC and Ors.
Detention of goods: Prescription of a time limit for holding seized goods deemed mandatory-Goods liable to be returned when no action initiated by way of issuance of show cause notice within six months or extended period-Whether the respondents could be directed to release the imported goods covered under the bill of entry in terms of section 110(2) of the Customs Act [LexDoc Id : 498612]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2016 |
Pavitar Singh and Ors. vs Ministry of Finance
Criminal complaint: Allegation of preparation of forged duty entitlement pass book-Pre-judging the case and critically appreciating evidence before trial not possible, Petition dismissed-Whether the petitions seeking quashing of criminal complaint filed under section 132 and section 135 of the Customs Act 1962 along with the summoning [LexDoc Id : 498622]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2016 |
Vayam Technologies Ltd. vs CTT
Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004: Inspection of records-Powers of commissioner under section 59-Whether the contention that, in the absence of any rules being framed under section 102(2)(z) read with section 59(2) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act [LexDoc Id : 498624]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Slug India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 498554]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
HLPL Global Logistics (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 498617]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Greatship India Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Restriction on transfer or sale of goods imported using SFIS duty certificates or scrips for payment of customs duty-Notification taking away what relevant paragraphs of Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures permitting-Whether Customs Notification No.91 dated 11 September 2009 restricting the transfer or sale of goods imported using the Served From India Scheme (SFIS [LexDoc Id : 498616]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Unlimited Nutrition (P) Ltd. vs CC and Ors.
Proprietary foods: Mandatory compliance with labelling requirements-Affixation of labels on imported food articles permitted only to a limited extent-Whether proprietary foods were outside the purview of the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards a [LexDoc Id : 498312]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
LGC Promochem India (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CC and Service Tax
Classification of goods: Pharmaceutical Reference Standard-Imported goods squarely covered by exemption Notification, Demand of duty and imposition of penalties held unsustainable-Whether denial of benefit of exemption Notification of reduced rate of duty only on the ground that the appellant had not passed the conditions of Cha [LexDoc Id : 498460]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2016 |
K2 Machine Tools (P) Ltd. vs CC
CC vs K2 Machine Tools (P) Ltd. and M. Udaya Kumar
Imposition of anti dumping duty: Duty imposed only on plastic processing or injection moulding machines-Parts of injection moulding machine imported, No case in which circumvention of duty investigated and ordered under anti dumping law-Whether the challenge to demand for anti dumping duty as also against the penalties imposed was sustainable. Held, anti dumping duty was imposed only [LexDoc Id : 498459]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
CC vs Vuppalamritha Magnetic Components Ltd.
Eligibility of exemption: CDMA FWT equipments on par with cellular phones and mobile handsets-Benefit of exemption extendable to parts and accessories of CDMA FWT-Whether the appellate authority had correctly held that the goods imported by the respondent were the parts, components and accessories of fixed wirel [LexDoc Id : 498556]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Lucky Steel Industries vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 498461]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Singhania ALU-Foil Containers Manufacturing Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 498553]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Chandok Textiles Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 498318]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2016 |
R.S.G. Stones vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 498551]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
P.M. International vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 498550]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Indo Burma Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs Commissioner VAT Delhi and Ors.
Delhi Value Added Tax Act 2004: Benefit of proviso to section 2(1)(zd)-Benefit ceasing to be partly or fully applicable when there was a partial roll back and complete roll back-Whether the high court was justified in holding that when there was a partial roll back and complete roll back, the benefit of proviso to section 2(1) [LexDoc Id : 498006]
|
SC |
2016 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|