| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 275 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Gopal Saha and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 497560]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Suchita Aggarwal vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 497690]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Pravin V. Gada and Kishore P. Shah vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 497687]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Orbit Jewellers and Ors. vs CC and Ors.
CC vs Omkar Jewellers and Ors.
Deposit of entire duty amount along with interest and penalties-No further proceedings required to be continued in terms of section 28(1A) of Customs Act 1962 and first proviso thereto-Whether the proceedings would stand concluded in respect of all the issues involved in respect of all the appellants when the entire duty amount along [LexDoc Id : 497686]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Shreeji Prints (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 497689]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Kumagai Skanska HCC Itochu Group vs Commissioner of Value Added Tax and Ors.
Exercise of revisional power by Deputy Commissioner: Quasi judicial authority to discharge statutory discretionary powers independently-Deputy Commissioner acting on the directions of superior officers, Invoking of revisional power unjustified and unwarranted-Whether the power of revision was validly exercised by the Deputy Commissioner in the instant case. Held, a quasi judicial authority should discharge [LexDoc Id : 497562]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Bullion and Jewellers Association (Regd.) and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
CBEC Circulars: Denial of benefit of preferential customs duty and demand of bank guarantee-Circulars held ultra vires section 151A of Customs Act 1962, Proceedings consequent thereto set aside-Whether the Circular dated 06 October 2015 stating, inter alia, that gold jewellery imported by the first petitioner from Indonesia did not satisfy th [LexDoc Id : 497558]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Mahadev Textiles, Om Udyog and B Engineers and Builders Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 497684]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
Tirupati Enterprises vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Gujarat Value Added Tax Act 2003: Detention and seizure-Action of respondents in breach of section 68 and section 69, Seizure memorandum set aside-Whether detention of petitioner's truck and seizure of its goods was justified. The petitioner had challenged the seizure memorandum mainly on two gro [LexDoc Id : 497570]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2016 |
Aditya Ganguly vs UOI and Ors.
Suspension of customs broker licence: Abetting client in illegal import transaction-Impugned order founded on basis of previous order holding petitioner guilty, Petition dismissed-Whether suspension of the petitioner's licence as a customs broker was valid. Held, since an order of suspension of a customs broker licence might be [LexDoc Id : 497556]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Himanshu C Sopariwala vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 497293]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2016 |
Anax Air Services (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 497291]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2016 |
M.R. International, Rakesh Magoo and John Miranda vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 497294]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2016 |
Babul Roy and Swadesh Ch.Paul vs CC and CE
Seizure of gold bars: Denial of ownership claim-Evidence of licit acquisition of seven gold bars produced, Subsequent retraction of statement, Appeals allowed-Whether imposition of penalty on the first appellant and denial of ownership claim of seized gold bars of the second appellant was valid. Held, once t [LexDoc Id : 497292]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Central Board of Excise and Customs and Ors. vs Rajesh Exports Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 497563]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2016 |
Centre for Public Interest Litigation vs UOI and Ors.
Challenge to decision allowing voice telephony on payment of entry fee: Recommendations of TRAI-Scope of interference by court with policy decision as regards migration, Petition dismissed-Whether the challenge to the decision of Government of India allowing voice telephony to second respondent on payment of Rs.1,658 crores entry fee was [LexDoc Id : 496609]
|
SC |
2016 |
Samsung India Electronics (P) Ltd. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 496911]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Sanwar Agarwal vs CC and Ors.
Classification of goods: Applicability of Circular-Circular containing executive instructions but not issued under any statute, Circular and show cause notice based thereon quashed-Whether Customs Circular No.19 dated 09 May 2013 relating of classification of goods was applicable to the petitioner's case. Held, the Circular at be [LexDoc Id : 496802]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2016 |
Shiv Shakti Trading Co. vs CC and Ors.
Seizure of goods: Waiver of right to be given a show cause notice-No adjudication order passed for a period of one year after seizure, No justification to continue detention of seized goods-Whether there could be any valid waiver of right to be given a show cause notice under section 124(a) of the Customs Act 1962. Held, except where offe [LexDoc Id : 496912]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Dish TV India Ltd. vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 496803]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
CC vs Nitko Impex (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 496637]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Jindal Aluminium Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 496605]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
ITD-ITD CEM JV vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 496805]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2016 |
Dhanalakshmi Irons vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 496588]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
Reliance Industries Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 496639]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2016 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
