| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 444 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Samsung India Electronics (P) Ltd. vs CC, CE and Servie Tax
[LexDoc Id : 510376]
|
CESTAT (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Sanco Trans Ltd. vs Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 510686]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
CC vs Mukadam Freight Systems (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 525174]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Jagson International Ltd., Jagdish Pershad Gupta vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525169]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Mirza Ghouse Ahmed vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510373]
|
CESTAT (Hyderabad) |
2017 |
Maa Bhagwati Coke (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510372]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
Cargosol and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510370]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
Bombay Marine Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510369]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Arihant Krupa Traders and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510367]
|
CESTAT (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Aban Exim (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510366]
|
CESTAT (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Reliance Retail Ltd. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
Input tax credit-Rule 20 of Punjab Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 and Section 13(3) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Prescribe time limit.-Petitioner sought declaration that Rule 20 of Rules is ultra-vires Section 13(3) of Act in so far as it prescribes time limit of 90 days for claiming [LexDoc Id : 510690]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2017 |
Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 510687]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Kunal Travels (CARGO) vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 510028]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
CCCE vs Sesa Goa Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 509756]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2017 |
Sigma Power Products (P) Ltd. vs CC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509397]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
Acme Industrial Corpn. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 509129]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
Premier Cotton Textiles vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 508773]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
JKM Graphics Solutions (P) Ltd. vs CTO
[LexDoc Id : 509472]
|
HC (Madras) |
2017 |
Pee Kay Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 508772]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
Khandelwal Enterprises Shivpuri vs CCT
[LexDoc Id : 509354]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Commissioner of Customs-Kandla vs Arvind Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 508766]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
ABB India Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 509403]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
B. Ghosh and Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 509350]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2017 |
VPSSR Facilities vs Commissioner of Value Added and Ors.
Exigible to Tax-Consumable chemicals/solvents-Commissioner Valued Added Tax holding that chemicals/Solvents used in process of cleaning, amounted to sale of goods and moment chemicals were poured [LexDoc Id : 508638]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Pr. Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Customs vs Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre
Levy of penalty-Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. Addition.-Whether, CESTAT erred in holding that "no penalty under Section 112(a) of Act, 1962 could have been levied in circumstances of case. Held, CESTAT coul [LexDoc Id : 508634]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next | Last |
| |
