| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 444 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vitrag Impex vs State of Gujarat and Ors.
Attachment-Pendency of appeal-Whether, in facts and circumstances of case impugned notices of attachment during pendency of the appeal was justified. Held, facts established from [LexDoc Id : 519597]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Subash Projets and Marketing Ltd., Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525961]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2017 |
Ketan D. Ruparel, NIMA Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525171]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Hotel Tunga Regency (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525168]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Vijay Shankar Prasad vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Double jeopardy-Criminal prosecution-Whether, criminal prosecution can be said to be barred or a case of double jeopardy. Held, it is clear that prosecution in criminal law and proceeding [LexDoc Id : 519594]
|
HC (Patna) |
2017 |
Saraswati Knitwears (P) Ltd., Rajnish Tuli vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525960]
|
CESTAT (Chandigarh) |
2017 |
Jayesh Marfatia, Manilal Patel Clearing and Forwarding (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525170]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Hotel Tunga Regency (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 526090]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
CC vs Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 525962]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
Kirit Dhruv vs CC
CC vs Raj Associates
[LexDoc Id : 525172]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Jagteshwar Prasad Bansal and Ors. vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
Enforceability of award-Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Adjudicatory process.-Whether, arbitral award has not become enforceable because of pendency of the objection petition under section 34 of the Act. Held, as SARFAESI Act an [LexDoc Id : 519599]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2017 |
Seamec Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525175]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Sara International Ltd.
Sara International Ltd. vs CCE, Customs and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 525959]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2017 |
CC vs Maya Enterprises, Anil Kumar
[LexDoc Id : 525956]
|
CESTAT (Chandigarh) |
2017 |
Ligare Aviation Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525955]
|
CESTAT (Chandigarh) |
2017 |
Malu Electrodes (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525173]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2017 |
Staunch Natural Resources (P) Ltd. vs CESTAT and Ors.
Entitlement to refund of export duties-Section 27 of the Customs Act. Applicability of limitation period when no export took place-Petitioner has prayed for direction for refund. Whether, the Petitioner entitled to refund in case when the goods were never exported. Held, from the [LexDoc Id : 519595]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2017 |
Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 525954]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
New Mount Trading and Investment Co. Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner Grade-I Commercial Tax and Ors.
Validity of reassessment proceedings-Section 29 of the U.P. VAT Act, 2007. Jurisdiction to issue reassessment notice-Petitioner has challenge the reassessment proceeding initiated against it under Section 29 of the Act. Whether, the assessing authority has reasons to [LexDoc Id : 519431]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2017 |
Capricorn Logistics (P) Ltd. vs CC
Maintainability of Appeal-Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962. Regulation 21 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. Appeal by Customs Broker-Petition filed to challenge the order of the Respondent-Commissioner of Customs under Regulation 23 of the Regulations prohibiting the operation of th [LexDoc Id : 519151]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2017 |
Vipul Overseas (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 519152]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2017 |
Morepen Laboratories Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 526798]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
CCE and Service Tax vs Anchor Soap (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 526794]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2017 |
CC vs Ibrahim Abdullah Rahiman
[LexDoc Id : 526792]
|
CESTAT (Allahabad) |
2017 |
S. Benjamin vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 526113]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2017 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
