First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 223 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Indus Towers Ltd. vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 531814]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Suguna Foods Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 530294]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
Pioneer (Customs Broker) vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 530293]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
CC vs Ace Designers Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 530292]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2018 |
Divis Laboratories Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 530159]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
CC vs Dilip Kumar and Co. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 528126]
|
SC |
2018 |
Harminder Singh Chadha and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 528483]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
National Co-op. Consumers Federation of India Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 528482]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Pushkar Impex (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Violation of principles of natural justice-Customs Act, 1962. Opportunity of hearing-Whether, the impugned order passed to be quashed for violation of principles of natural justice. Held, Person against whom show-cause notice has been [LexDoc Id : 528051]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
Nordic Intertrade (Norway) vs Steel Authority of India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 527885]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Siria Rice and General Mills vs Food Corpn. of India and Anr.
Exemption from payment of tax-Tax on sale-Whether, communication issued by the Food Corporation of India declining claim of petitioner for payment of tax on rice supplied under levy order can [LexDoc Id : 529190]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
Punj Lloyd Ltd. vs Commissioner VAT
Process and refund of excess amount-Delhi Value Added Tax Act. Time period-Whether, the respondent authorities were justified in rejecting petitioner’s claim to process and refund excess amounts payable to it for two periods [LexDoc Id : 528058]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Hamdard (WAKF) Laboratories vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 529193]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
H.N.S. Ent Udyog vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 527192]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Nishant Sanjay Ghogare vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 556766]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2018 |
Hotel Hillock (P) Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner vs Hotel Hillock (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 529173]
|
GOI |
2018 |
Ota Falloons Forwarders (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Validity of revocation order-Regulation 13(o) of Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. Regulation 11(n) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013. Provision applicable-Whether, citing Regulations of 2013 in impugned order vitiate it. Held, authorities did have the power to pass impugned order in manner and to extent [LexDoc Id : 526145]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2018 |
S. Cannussamy vs CC and CE and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 526500]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Trinity Forwarders (Madras) vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 526146]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2018 |
Agya Import Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner of Customs and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 526144]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Northern Motors vs CTT
Evasion of tax-Authorization-Whether, no infirmity either in the order of the appellate authority or the Tribunal to remand the case to the Assessing Authority. Held, findings of [LexDoc Id : 525492]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
Manish Uppal vs Fiorano Motors LLP and Ors.
Specific performance-Customs duty-Whether, decree should be passed, in favour of plaintiff and against defendants. Held, not only is aforesaid statement not correct according to the av [LexDoc Id : 525491]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Raj Traders, Ideal Impex and Guruvinder Singh Kochhar vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 524916]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2018 |
H. Tribhovandas and Sons vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 524527]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2018 |
Mittal Pigments (P) Ltd. and Rameshkumar Aggarwal vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 524178]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2018 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
|