| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 202 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
MSK International, K. Saravanan, Sujath Ali vs CC
Imposition of Penalty-Search of premises-Search of premises of importer M/s.MSK International was carried out by officers of SIIB. Whether, imposition of penalty on Appellant was sustainable. [LexDoc Id : 536294]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2019 |
CC vs Vedanta Aluminium Ltd.
Entitlement to refund-Clearance-Respondent filed bill of entry for clearance of Calcined Petroleum Coke. Whether, appellant was entitled to the refund because there was no assessment [LexDoc Id : 536288]
|
CESTAT (Hyderabad) |
2019 |
Sahayak Samagri Prabandhak vs Commissioner Uttar Pradesh Commercial Tax
[LexDoc Id : 537014]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2019 |
Dex Logistics (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 536379]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Ayesha Exports vs UOI and Ors.
Payment of duty-Suppression of facts-Respondents are engaged in manufacture of excisable goods falling under chapter 87. During the year 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 M/s DASL received duty pai [LexDoc Id : 536641]
|
HC (Patna) |
2019 |
Varahi Chemicals vs CC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 536640]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2019 |
CC vs Atul Automations (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Re-exported-Utility period-Commissioner of Customs held that imports were in violation of the Foreign Trade Policy framed under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Ac [LexDoc Id : 536286]
|
SC |
2019 |
Bernard Maurice Gerard Kuhne (Dead) through L.Rs vs CC
Variation-Climate condition-Deceased Bernard Maurice Gerard Kuhne a national of the Netherlands purchased 575 numbers of old and used Burma teak wood of an old building from one [LexDoc Id : 536426]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Senthilkumar vs Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 536642]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2019 |
Edelweiss Metals Ltd. vs CC
Availing of exemption-Sections 111 (d) and 111 (m) of Customs Act, 1962. Confiscation.-Appellant had imported Gold dore bar falling under Customs tariff. Appellant while importing goods had availed exemption. Whether, benefit of subject [LexDoc Id : 536114]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2019 |
Aquatech Systems (Asia) (P) Ltd. vs CC
Royalty Charges-Rule 9(1)(c) of Valuation Rules, 1988 and Rule 10(1)(c) of Valuation Rules 2007. Imported goods.-Tribunal holding that Royalty Charges cannot be added to the value of imported goods. Whether, finding of Tribunal regarding royalty charges sustainab [LexDoc Id : 536116]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
CC vs Viraj Impex (P) Ltd.
Transaction Value-Contemporaneous import-Respondent entered into contract for import of two consignments of Hot Rolled Coils Whether, no valid reasons have been recorded by the Adjudicating A [LexDoc Id : 536111]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Baglan Taluka Grape Growers Co-op. Society Ltd. vs CCE
Demand of duty-Imposition of penalty-Demand was made from Appellant and penalty was also imposed. Whether, demand of duty and imposition of penalty is without the authority. Held, duty li [LexDoc Id : 536209]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Matrix Info Systems (P) Ltd., Sunil Jain vs CC
Undervaluing-Rule 12 of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007. Bonafides-Whether, declared value of impugned goods covered by Bill of entry stands rejected under Rule 12 of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Impor [LexDoc Id : 536208]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
CC vs Jyotsna Chikersal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 536345]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Tranasia Bio-Medicals Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 536218]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Nayara Energy Ltd. @ Essar Oil Ltd. vs CC
Exemption-Payment of duty-Appellants filed Bill of Entry for clearance of "CR Engine with spares and accessories. Whether, error committed by the appellant was a bonafide error [LexDoc Id : 536213]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
CC vs Shiva Khurana
[LexDoc Id : 536343]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2019 |
Varroc Engg. (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 535649]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
Currency Note Press vs CC
Exemption-Refund-Goods imported by Appellants as per them were exempted under Notification No 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 Sl No 155). However inadvertently they filed [LexDoc Id : 535648]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
KMK Shipping and Clearing (P) Ltd. vs CC
Prescribed period-Submission of report-Appellants are Customs Broker with licence issued by Chennai Customs and also permitted to transact business in Mumbai Customs Zone. Whether, prescrib [LexDoc Id : 535629]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2019 |
Abubakar Ismail Kapadia vs CCE and Service Tax
Confiscation of raw material-Payment of duty-Appeal against duty demand and penalty imposed upon Appellant whereas Customs against confiscation of raw material used in finished goods and also of [LexDoc Id : 535628]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2019 |
Krishna Capital and Rohit Sakhuja vs CC
Benefit of provision-Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Interpretation.-Appellant as Proprietor is engaged in the import of Air Conditioners of General Brand, LED Panels, Parts of LED TVs, Packing material and other electr [LexDoc Id : 535627]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2019 |
Kopran Ltd. vs CC
Anti dumping duty-Clearance of goods-Confirm demand of Anti Dumping Duty of certain sum from the date of clearance of the goods to the actual payment of duty. Whether, demand of anti dump [LexDoc Id : 535626]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2019 |
International Seaport Dredging Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 535625]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2019 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| |
